From: "Carew, Alan" <alan.carew@intel.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_cmdline: FreeBSD Fix oveflow when size of command result structure is greater than BUFSIZ
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:26:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0E29434AEE0C3A4180987AB476A6F6306D281C01@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413818593-26269-1-git-send-email-alan.carew@intel.com>
A comment on my own patch.
Making the size of result_buf consistent across each OS and keeping it as large
as the Linux BUFSIZ(8192) doesn't really address the core issue.
In the event that a user of librte_cmdline creates a custom context with a
result structure > 8192 bytes then this problem will occur again, though
somewhat unlikely, as the minimum number of the largest type would be 64 x
cmdline_fixed_string_t types within a result structure, at its current size.
There is no checking of overflow, I would be tempted to add a runtime check in
cmdline_parse()/match_inst(), however I would be more comfortable with a build
time check for this type of problem.
Due to the opaque handling of user defined contexts there is no obvious way to
do this at build time.
Thoughts?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Alan Carew
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2014 4:23 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_cmdline: FreeBSD Fix oveflow when size of
> command result structure is greater than BUFSIZ
>
> When using test-pmd with flow director in FreeBSD, the application will
> segfault/Bus error while parsing the command-line. This is due to how
> each commands result structure is represented during parsing, where the offsets
> for each tokens value is stored in a character array(char result_buf[BUFSIZ])
> in cmdline_parse()(./lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c).
>
> The overflow occurs where BUFSIZ is less than the size of a commands result
> structure, in this case "struct cmd_pkt_filter_result"
> (app/test-pmd/cmdline.c) is 1088 bytes and BUFSIZ on FreeBSD is 1024 bytes as
> opposed to 8192 bytes on Linux.
>
> This patch removes the OS dependency on BUFSIZ and defines and uses a
> library #define CMDLINE_PARSE_RESULT_BUFSIZE 8192
>
> The problem can be reproduced by running test-pmd on FreeBSD:
> ./testpmd -c 0x3 -n 4 -- -i --portmask=0x3 --pkt-filter-mode=perfect
> And adding a filter:
> add_perfect_filter 0 udp src 192.168.0.0 1024 dst 192.168.0.0 1024 flexbytes
> 0x800 vlan 0 queue 0 soft 0x17
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Carew <alan.carew@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c | 2 +-
> lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.h | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c
> b/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c
> index 940480d..29f1afd 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.c
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ cmdline_parse(struct cmdline *cl, const char * buf)
> unsigned int inst_num=0;
> cmdline_parse_inst_t *inst;
> const char *curbuf;
> - char result_buf[BUFSIZ];
> + char result_buf[CMDLINE_PARSE_RESULT_BUFSIZE];
> void (*f)(void *, struct cmdline *, void *) = NULL;
> void *data = NULL;
> int comment = 0;
> diff --git a/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.h
> b/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.h
> index f18836d..dae53ba 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_cmdline/cmdline_parse.h
> @@ -80,6 +80,9 @@ extern "C" {
> #define CMDLINE_PARSE_COMPLETE_AGAIN 1
> #define CMDLINE_PARSE_COMPLETED_BUFFER 2
>
> +/* maximum buffer size for parsed result */
> +#define CMDLINE_PARSE_RESULT_BUFSIZE 8192
> +
> /**
> * Stores a pointer to the ops struct, and the offset: the place to
> * write the parsed result in the destination structure.
> --
> 1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-20 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-20 15:23 Alan Carew
2014-10-20 15:26 ` Carew, Alan [this message]
2014-10-20 20:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-10-27 9:14 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-03 16:05 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-03 18:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-04 14:01 ` Carew, Alan
2014-12-04 14:15 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-04 15:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0E29434AEE0C3A4180987AB476A6F6306D281C01@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=alan.carew@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).