From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3757EB0 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:01:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2014 06:01:25 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,515,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="632648016" Received: from irsmsx108.ger.corp.intel.com ([163.33.3.3]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 04 Dec 2014 06:01:19 -0800 Received: from irsmsx109.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.13.244]) by IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com ([169.254.11.150]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:01:18 +0000 From: "Carew, Alan" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_cmdline: FreeBSD Fix oveflow when size of command result structure is greater than BUFSIZ Thread-Index: AQHP7Hnt3FdPCdzYGkeDOrtcPm6MI5w5GvrAgAqY4QCAOpkIgIAAI5IAgAFKHjA= Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:01:17 +0000 Message-ID: <0E29434AEE0C3A4180987AB476A6F6306D2B0558@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1413818593-26269-1-git-send-email-alan.carew@intel.com> <544E0CF2.8090408@6wind.com> <547F34B9.7090400@6wind.com> <1507264.Zu5HfbIg9Y@xps13> In-Reply-To: <1507264.Zu5HfbIg9Y@xps13> Accept-Language: en-IE, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [163.33.239.182] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_cmdline: FreeBSD Fix oveflow when size of command result structure is greater than BUFSIZ X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:01:28 -0000 Hi folks and thanks, > > Sorry, I had no time to deeply check this. I think your patch can go > > in 1.8 as it's still an enhancement compared to the current situation. > > We may go back on this later. > > > > Acked-by: Olivier Matz >=20 > Applied >=20 > Thanks > -- > Thomas I did post a V2 http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007920.html. I must have used an incorrect message ID incorrect for "--in-reply-to" thou= gh. Regards, Alan.