From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zhang.zhangkun@huawei.com>
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C864538EB
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri,  5 Sep 2014 05:03:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO SZXEMA402-HUB.china.huawei.com)
 ([172.24.2.119])
 by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued)
 with ESMTP id BZB45493; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 11:07:49 +0800 (CST)
Received: from SZXEMA505-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.3]) by
 SZXEMA402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001;
 Fri, 5 Sep 2014 11:07:40 +0800
From: "Zhangkun (K)" <zhang.zhangkun@huawei.com>
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Thread-Topic: Are there considerations about resource recycling by the
 process, not by the OS?
Thread-Index: Ac/ItoztML2GPl90QYqzllMtQta6xA==
Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 03:07:40 +0000
Message-ID: <0FCB215400789046A95ECE23C3E46C515F958EDB@szxema505-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.177.25.235]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Are there considerations about resource recycling by the
 process, not by the OS?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 03:03:13 -0000

Hi,
   I develop the program with the use of dpdk and the process is core dump =
when the program is started.
The process is crash in case of initing memory failed and calling rte_panic=
 function.
 I search all rte_panic function in the dpdk, and find it so many. Therefor=
e, in case the pr ocess happen fail,
it will abort. The resource allocated before is not released by the process=
, but by the OS system.
So I have a question: Are there considerations about resource recycling by =
the process, not by the OS ?