From: "Hu, Jiayu" <jiayu.hu@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
"Wang, YuanX" <yuanx.wang@intel.com>,
"Ma, WenwuX" <wenwux.ma@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/14] vhost: clean-up and simplify async implementation
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 06:24:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0aac1965146d4fcd8829672d07c2f297@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211007220013.355530-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Hi Maxime,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, October 8, 2021 6:00 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; Hu, Jiayu
> <jiayu.hu@intel.com>; Wang, YuanX <yuanx.wang@intel.com>; Ma,
> WenwuX <wenwux.ma@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce
> <bruce.richardson@intel.com>; Mcnamara, John
> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
> Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> Subject: [RFC 00/14] vhost: clean-up and simplify async implementation
>
> This series aims at cleaning and simplifying the async enqueue path. I think it
> makes the code easier to understand, and is necessary before integrating
> new changes.
I really appreciate those changes, and the code looks better, especially for
improving io vector logic, as the existed implementation has a potential risk
of OOB reads/writes.
About the fifth patch, removing async batch threshold, this change is OK for me,
as current vhost is packet level offloading and buffer level DMA batching copy
will be done inside the DMA callback, so no need to keep the batching threshold.
But when integrate DMA logic inside vhost, the async data path still needs to handle
buffer level batching, and some of deleted code may need to be recovered.
Thanks,
Jiayu
>
> I may have more reworks to propose in next revisions, but I wanted to share
> my current status early so that you have time to review/test it.
>
> It is only compile-tested, as I don't have HW with IOAT support to test it.
>
> Maxime Coquelin (14):
> vhost: move async data in a dedicated structure
> vhost: hide inflight async structure
> vhost: simplify async IO vectors
> vhost: simplify async IO vectors iterators
> vhost: remove async batch threshold
> vhost: introduce specific iovec structure
> vhost: remove useless fields in async iterator struct
> vhost: improve IO vector logic
> vhost: remove notion of async descriptor
> vhost: simplify async enqueue completion
> vhost: simplify getting the first in-flight index
> vhost: prepare async for mbuf to desc refactoring
> vhost: prepare sync for mbuf to desc refactoring
> vhost: merge sync and async mbuf to desc filling
>
> examples/vhost/ioat.c | 30 +-
> examples/vhost/ioat.h | 2 +-
> lib/vhost/rte_vhost_async.h | 42 +--
> lib/vhost/vhost.c | 129 +++----
> lib/vhost/vhost.h | 67 ++--
> lib/vhost/vhost_user.c | 4 +-
> lib/vhost/virtio_net.c | 697 ++++++++++++++----------------------
> 7 files changed, 379 insertions(+), 592 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-12 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-07 21:59 Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 01/14] vhost: move async data in a dedicated structure Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-14 3:24 ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-10-14 8:54 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 02/14] vhost: hide inflight async structure Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 03/14] vhost: simplify async IO vectors Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 04/14] vhost: simplify async IO vectors iterators Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 05/14] vhost: remove async batch threshold Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 06/14] vhost: introduce specific iovec structure Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 07/14] vhost: remove useless fields in async iterator struct Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 08/14] vhost: improve IO vector logic Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-12 6:05 ` Hu, Jiayu
2021-10-12 8:34 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 09/14] vhost: remove notion of async descriptor Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 10/14] vhost: simplify async enqueue completion Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 11/14] vhost: simplify getting the first in-flight index Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 12/14] vhost: prepare async for mbuf to desc refactoring Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 13/14] vhost: prepare sync " Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-07 22:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 14/14] vhost: merge sync and async mbuf to desc filling Maxime Coquelin
2021-10-08 12:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/14] vhost: clean-up and simplify async implementation David Marchand
2021-10-12 6:24 ` Hu, Jiayu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0aac1965146d4fcd8829672d07c2f297@intel.com \
--to=jiayu.hu@intel.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=wenwux.ma@intel.com \
--cc=yuanx.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).