DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>, Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"john.mcnamara@intel.com" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update failsafe feature list
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:32:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0b4190d7-dc1c-71d2-0e0b-13ab1d007e0c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB6PR0502MB3048849222C7A875E089CA63D2600@DB6PR0502MB3048.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>

On 9/19/2017 12:39 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi Ferruh
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 2:00 PM
>> To: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>; Gaetan Rivet
>> <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; john.mcnamara@intel.com
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update failsafe feature list
>>
>> On 9/19/2017 11:04 AM, Matan Azrad wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Ferruh
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yigit@intel.com]
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 12:27 PM
>>>> To: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>; Gaetan Rivet
>>>> <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>
>>>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update failsafe feature list
>>>>
>>>> On 9/14/2017 4:32 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
>>>>> Add supported failsafe features to feature list.
>>>>> Remove stats per queue feature from failsafe feature list since
>>>>> queue_stats_mapping_set dev op has not implemented yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>  doc/guides/nics/features/failsafe.ini | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>>>>>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/features/failsafe.ini
>>>>> b/doc/guides/nics/features/failsafe.ini
>>>>> index a42e344..9f48455 100644
>>>>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/features/failsafe.ini
>>>>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/features/failsafe.ini
>>>>> @@ -4,20 +4,33 @@
>>>>>  ; Refer to default.ini for the full list of available PMD features.
>>>>>  ;
>>>>>  [Features]
>>>>> +Speed capabilities   = Y
>>>>>  Link status          = Y
>>>>>  Link status event    = Y
>>>>>  MTU update           = Y
>>>>>  Jumbo frame          = Y
>>>>> +Scattered Rx         = Y
>>>>> +LRO                  = Y
>>>>> +TSO                  = Y
>>>>>  Promiscuous mode     = Y
>>>>>  Allmulticast mode    = Y
>>>>>  Unicast MAC filter   = Y
>>>>>  Multicast MAC filter = Y
>>>>>  VLAN filter          = Y
>>>>> +Ethertype filter     = Y
>>>>> +N-tuple filter       = Y
>>>>> +SYN filter           = Y
>>>>> +Tunnel filter        = Y
>>>>> +Flexible filter      = Y
>>>>> +Hash filter          = Y
>>>>> +Flow director        = Y
>>>>>  Flow control         = Y
>>>>>  Flow API             = Y
>>>>> +QinQ offload         = Y
>>>>> +L3 checksum offload  = Y
>>>>> +L4 checksum offload  = Y
>>>>>  Packet type parsing  = Y
>>>>>  Basic stats          = Y
>>>>> -Stats per queue      = Y
>>>>>  ARMv7                = Y
>>>>>  ARMv8                = Y
>>>>>  Power8               = Y
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure if claiming support for these features is correct.
>>>> Failsafe itself doesn't provide these features, but relies underlying
>>>> hardware which we don't really know what they supports or not in this
>> stage.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Don't you think that almost all failsafe features rely underlying hardware or
>> sub PMDs?
>>
>> You are right, perhaps we should remove all. This is helpful to show what
>> device features are supported. For failsafe, is this information useful?
>>
> Since there are features that failsafe cannot support without any sub PMD dependences
> (for example "Stats per queue") it is useful.

Sorry, I missed your point.

Device feature list documentation is good for:
- End user can easily see what to expect from a device/driver.
- To trace what features implemented for a device.
- To find out which device has a specific desired feature.

For failsafe, it is a virtual overlay device on other physical devices.

The supported architectures and provided documents features can be
useful. But why/how NIC related features can be useful since all they
are coming form underlay devices?

> 
>>>
>>>> OK for dropping "Stats per queue"
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-22 10:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-14 15:32 Matan Azrad
2017-09-18 13:51 ` Mcnamara, John
2017-09-19  9:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-09-19 10:04   ` Matan Azrad
2017-09-19 11:00     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-09-19 11:39       ` Matan Azrad
2017-09-22 10:32         ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-09-24  5:55           ` Matan Azrad
2017-10-25 18:44             ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-25 22:55               ` Gaëtan Rivet
2017-11-01 22:33               ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-02  5:53                 ` Matan Azrad
2017-11-02 17:48                   ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0b4190d7-dc1c-71d2-0e0b-13ab1d007e0c@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).