From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com (dispatch1-us1.ppe-hosted.com [148.163.129.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3193572 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 18:08:05 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Proofpoint Essentials engine Received: from webmail.solarflare.com (uk.solarflare.com [193.34.186.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1-us4.ppe-hosted.com (Proofpoint Essentials ESMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 1F3A94C005C; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (85.187.13.33) by ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1044.25; Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:07:59 +0100 To: Ferruh Yigit , References: <1531648575-7568-1-git-send-email-arybchenko@solarflare.com> <2027a253-f006-640d-eb85-645a88772112@intel.com> From: Andrew Rybchenko Message-ID: <0d53ad00-d432-f6c8-6d14-46f21053e150@solarflare.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 19:07:48 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2027a253-f006-640d-eb85-645a88772112@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [85.187.13.33] X-ClientProxiedBy: ocex03.SolarFlarecom.com (10.20.40.36) To ukex01.SolarFlarecom.com (10.17.10.4) X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-11.0.0.1191-8.100.1062-23978.003 X-TM-AS-Result: No--1.743400-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-MDID: 1532016485-U1brXmr551F5 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] net/sfc: improve Rx checksumming support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 16:08:06 -0000 On 19.07.2018 13:56, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 7/15/2018 10:56 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: >> Andrew Rybchenko (3): >> net/sfc: move Rx checksum offload check to device level >> net/sfc: fix Rx queue offloads reporting in queue info >> net/sfc: prepare to support Rx datapath without checksum > Hi Andrew, > > These conflict with another sfc patchset already applied, would you mind > rebasing the set on top of latest next-net? Hi Ferruh, yes, of course. Thanks, Andrew.