DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	"Xia, Chenbo" <chenbo.xia@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 07:47:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0da52623500a44eca4c9367802043cd4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f1f34a7359584d46953d7b9f454168e9@intel.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Liu, Yong
> Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 2:27 PM
> To: 'Maxime Coquelin' <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>; Xia, Chenbo
> <chenbo.xia@intel.com>; Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 9:45 PM
> > To: Liu, Yong <yong.liu@intel.com>; Xia, Chenbo <chenbo.xia@intel.com>;
> > Wang, Zhihong <zhihong.wang@intel.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/19/20 5:24 AM, Marvin Liu wrote:
> > > Optimize vhost packed ring dequeue path with SIMD instructions. Four
> > > descriptors status check and writeback are batched handled with
> AVX512
> > > instructions. Address translation operations are also accelerated by
> > > AVX512 instructions.
> > >
> > > If platform or compiler not support vectorization, will fallback to
> > > default path.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> > >
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/Makefile b/lib/librte_vhost/Makefile
> > > index 4f2f3e47da..c0cd7d498f 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/Makefile
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/Makefile
> > > @@ -31,6 +31,13 @@ CFLAGS += -DVHOST_ICC_UNROLL_PRAGMA
> > >  endif
> > >  endif
> > >
> > > +ifneq ($(FORCE_DISABLE_AVX512), y)
> > > +        CC_AVX512_SUPPORT=\
> > > +        $(shell $(CC) -march=native -dM -E - </dev/null 2>&1 | \
> > > +        sed '/./{H;$$!d} ; x ; /AVX512F/!d; /AVX512BW/!d; /AVX512VL/!d' |
> \
> > > +        grep -q AVX512 && echo 1)
> > > +endif
> > > +
> > >  ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_NUMA),y)
> > >  LDLIBS += -lnuma
> > >  endif
> > > @@ -40,6 +47,12 @@ LDLIBS += -lrte_eal -lrte_mempool -lrte_mbuf -
> > lrte_ethdev -lrte_net
> > >  SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST) := fd_man.c iotlb.c socket.c vhost.c
> \
> > >  					vhost_user.c virtio_net.c vdpa.c
> > >
> > > +ifeq ($(CC_AVX512_SUPPORT), 1)
> > > +CFLAGS += -DCC_AVX512_SUPPORT
> > > +SRCS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST) += vhost_vec_avx.c
> > > +CFLAGS_vhost_vec_avx.o += -mavx512f -mavx512bw -mavx512vl
> > > +endif
> > > +
> > >  # install includes
> > >  SYMLINK-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST)-include += rte_vhost.h
> > rte_vdpa.h \
> > >  						rte_vdpa_dev.h
> > rte_vhost_async.h
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/meson.build b/lib/librte_vhost/meson.build
> > > index cc9aa65c67..c1481802d7 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/meson.build
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/meson.build
> > > @@ -8,6 +8,22 @@ endif
> > >  if has_libnuma == 1
> > >  	dpdk_conf.set10('RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST_NUMA', true)
> > >  endif
> > > +
> > > +if arch_subdir == 'x86'
> > > +        if not machine_args.contains('-mno-avx512f')
> > > +                if cc.has_argument('-mavx512f') and cc.has_argument('-
> > mavx512vl') and cc.has_argument('-mavx512bw')
> > > +                        cflags += ['-DCC_AVX512_SUPPORT']
> > > +                        vhost_avx512_lib = static_library('vhost_avx512_lib',
> > > +                                              'vhost_vec_avx.c',
> > > +                                              dependencies: [static_rte_eal,
> > static_rte_mempool,
> > > +                                                  static_rte_mbuf, static_rte_ethdev,
> > static_rte_net],
> > > +                                              include_directories: includes,
> > > +                                              c_args: [cflags, '-mavx512f', '-mavx512bw', '-
> > mavx512vl'])
> > > +                        objs +=
> vhost_avx512_lib.extract_objects('vhost_vec_avx.c')
> > > +                endif
> > > +        endif
> > > +endif
> > > +
> > >  if (toolchain == 'gcc' and cc.version().version_compare('>=8.3.0'))
> > >  	cflags += '-DVHOST_GCC_UNROLL_PRAGMA'
> > >  elif (toolchain == 'clang' and cc.version().version_compare('>=3.7.0'))
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> > > index 4a81f18f01..fc7daf2145 100644
> > > --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h
> > > @@ -1124,4 +1124,12 @@ virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc(struct virtio_net
> > *dev, struct rte_mempool *mp,
> > >  	return NULL;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +int
> > > +vhost_reserve_avail_batch_packed_avx(struct virtio_net *dev,
> > > +				 struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> > > +				 struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool,
> > > +				 struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> > > +				 uint16_t avail_idx,
> > > +				 uintptr_t *desc_addrs,
> > > +				 uint16_t *ids);
> > >  #endif /* _VHOST_NET_CDEV_H_ */
> > > diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_vec_avx.c
> > b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_vec_avx.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000000..e8361d18fa
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_vec_avx.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,152 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > > + * Copyright(c) 2010-2016 Intel Corporation
> > > + */
> > > +#include <stdint.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "vhost.h"
> > > +
> > > +#define BYTE_SIZE 8
> > > +/* reference count offset in mbuf rearm data */
> > > +#define REFCNT_BITS_OFFSET ((offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, refcnt) - \
> > > +	offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, rearm_data)) * BYTE_SIZE)
> > > +/* segment number offset in mbuf rearm data */
> > > +#define SEG_NUM_BITS_OFFSET ((offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, nb_segs) - \
> > > +	offsetof(struct rte_mbuf, rearm_data)) * BYTE_SIZE)
> > > +
> > > +/* default rearm data */
> > > +#define DEFAULT_REARM_DATA (1ULL << SEG_NUM_BITS_OFFSET | \
> > > +	1ULL << REFCNT_BITS_OFFSET)
> > > +
> > > +#define DESC_FLAGS_SHORT_OFFSET (offsetof(struct
> vring_packed_desc,
> > flags) / \
> > > +	sizeof(uint16_t))
> > > +
> > > +#define DESC_FLAGS_SHORT_SIZE (sizeof(struct vring_packed_desc) / \
> > > +	sizeof(uint16_t))
> > > +#define BATCH_FLAGS_MASK (1 << DESC_FLAGS_SHORT_OFFSET | \
> > > +	1 << (DESC_FLAGS_SHORT_OFFSET + DESC_FLAGS_SHORT_SIZE) | \
> > > +	1 << (DESC_FLAGS_SHORT_OFFSET + DESC_FLAGS_SHORT_SIZE * 2)  |
> > \
> > > +	1 << (DESC_FLAGS_SHORT_OFFSET + DESC_FLAGS_SHORT_SIZE * 3))
> > > +
> > > +#define FLAGS_BITS_OFFSET ((offsetof(struct vring_packed_desc, flags) -
> \
> > > +	offsetof(struct vring_packed_desc, len)) * BYTE_SIZE)
> > > +
> > > +#define PACKED_FLAGS_MASK ((0ULL | VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL |
> > VRING_DESC_F_USED) \
> > > +	<< FLAGS_BITS_OFFSET)
> > > +#define PACKED_AVAIL_FLAG ((0ULL | VRING_DESC_F_AVAIL) <<
> > FLAGS_BITS_OFFSET)
> > > +#define PACKED_AVAIL_FLAG_WRAP ((0ULL | VRING_DESC_F_USED) <<
> \
> > > +	FLAGS_BITS_OFFSET)
> > > +
> > > +#define DESC_FLAGS_POS 0xaa
> > > +#define MBUF_LENS_POS 0x6666
> > > +
> > > +int
> > > +vhost_reserve_avail_batch_packed_avx(struct virtio_net *dev,
> > > +				 struct vhost_virtqueue *vq,
> > > +				 struct rte_mempool *mbuf_pool,
> > > +				 struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
> > > +				 uint16_t avail_idx,
> > > +				 uintptr_t *desc_addrs,
> > > +				 uint16_t *ids)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct vring_packed_desc *descs = vq->desc_packed;
> > > +	uint32_t descs_status;
> > > +	void *desc_addr;
> > > +	uint16_t i;
> > > +	uint8_t cmp_low, cmp_high, cmp_result;
> > > +	uint64_t lens[PACKED_BATCH_SIZE];
> > > +
> > > +	if (unlikely(avail_idx & PACKED_BATCH_MASK))
> > > +		return -1;
> > > +
> > > +	/* load 4 descs */
> > > +	desc_addr = &vq->desc_packed[avail_idx];
> > > +	__m512i desc_vec = _mm512_loadu_si512(desc_addr);
> > > +
> > > +	/* burst check four status */
> > > +	__m512i avail_flag_vec;
> > > +	if (vq->avail_wrap_counter)
> > > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_I686)
> > > +		avail_flag_vec = _mm512_set4_epi64(PACKED_AVAIL_FLAG,
> > 0x0,
> > > +					PACKED_FLAGS_MASK, 0x0);
> > > +#else
> > > +		avail_flag_vec =
> > _mm512_maskz_set1_epi64(DESC_FLAGS_POS,
> > > +					PACKED_AVAIL_FLAG);
> > > +
> > > +#endif
> > > +	else
> > > +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_I686)
> > > +		avail_flag_vec =
> > _mm512_set4_epi64(PACKED_AVAIL_FLAG_WRAP,
> > > +					0x0, PACKED_AVAIL_FLAG_WRAP,
> > 0x0);
> > > +#else
> > > +		avail_flag_vec =
> > _mm512_maskz_set1_epi64(DESC_FLAGS_POS,
> > > +					PACKED_AVAIL_FLAG_WRAP);
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +	descs_status = _mm512_cmp_epu16_mask(desc_vec, avail_flag_vec,
> > > +		_MM_CMPINT_NE);
> > > +	if (descs_status & BATCH_FLAGS_MASK)
> > > +		return -1;
> > > +
> > > +	/* check buffer fit into one region & translate address */
> > > +	__m512i regions_low_addrs =
> > > +		_mm512_loadu_si512((void *)&dev->regions_low_addrs);
> > > +	__m512i regions_high_addrs =
> > > +		_mm512_loadu_si512((void *)&dev->regions_high_addrs);
> > > +	vhost_for_each_try_unroll(i, 0, PACKED_BATCH_SIZE) {
> > > +		uint64_t addr_low = descs[avail_idx + i].addr;
> > > +		uint64_t addr_high = addr_low + descs[avail_idx + i].len;
> > > +		__m512i low_addr_vec = _mm512_set1_epi64(addr_low);
> > > +		__m512i high_addr_vec = _mm512_set1_epi64(addr_high);
> > > +
> > > +		cmp_low = _mm512_cmp_epi64_mask(low_addr_vec,
> > > +				regions_low_addrs, _MM_CMPINT_NLT);
> > > +		cmp_high = _mm512_cmp_epi64_mask(high_addr_vec,
> > > +				regions_high_addrs, _MM_CMPINT_LT);
> > > +		cmp_result = cmp_low & cmp_high;
> > > +		int index = __builtin_ctz(cmp_result);
> > > +		if (unlikely((uint32_t)index >= dev->mem->nregions))
> > > +			goto free_buf;
> > > +
> > > +		desc_addrs[i] = addr_low +
> > > +			dev->mem->regions[index].host_user_addr -
> > > +			dev->mem->regions[index].guest_phys_addr;
> > > +		lens[i] = descs[avail_idx + i].len;
> > > +		rte_prefetch0((void *)(uintptr_t)desc_addrs[i]);
> > > +
> > > +		pkts[i] = virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc(dev, mbuf_pool, lens[i]);
> > > +		if (!pkts[i])
> > > +			goto free_buf;
> > > +	}
> >
> > The above does not support vIOMMU, isn't it?
> >
> > The more the packed datapath evolves, the more it gets optimized for a
> > very specific configuration.
> >
> > In v19.11, indirect descriptors and chained buffers are handled as a
> > fallback. And now vIOMMU support is handled as a fallback.
> >
> 
> Hi Maxime,
> Thanks for figuring out the feature miss. First version patch is lack of
> vIOMMU supporting.
> V2 patch will fix the feature gap between vectorized function and original
> batch function.
> So there will be no additional fallback introduced in vectorized patch set.
> 
> IMHO, current packed optimization introduced complexity is for handling
> that gap between performance aimed frontend (like PMD) and normal
> network traffic (like TCP).
> Vectorized datapath is focusing in enhancing the performance of batched
> function.  From function point of view, there will no difference between
> vectorized batched function and original batched function.
> Current packed ring path will remain the same if vectorized option is not
> enable. So I think the complexity won't increase too much. If there's any
> concern, please let me known.
> 
> BTW, vectorized path can help performance a lot when vIOMMU enabled.
> 

After double check, most performance difference came from runtime setting. 
Performance gain of vectorized path is not so obvious. 

> Regards,
> Marvin
> 
> > I personnally don't like the path it is taking as it is adding a lot of
> > complexity on top of that.
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-21  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-19  3:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path Marvin Liu
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] vhost: " Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] vhost " Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] vhost: " Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] vhost: reuse packed ring functions Marvin Liu
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] vhost: prepare memory regions addresses Marvin Liu
2020-10-06 15:06       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue Marvin Liu
2020-10-06 14:59       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-08  7:05         ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-06 15:18       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-09  7:59         ` Liu, Yong
2020-09-21  6:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue Marvin Liu
2020-10-06 15:00       ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-08  7:09         ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-06 13:34     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-08  6:20       ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-09  8:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] vhost: " Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] vhost: reuse packed ring functions Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] vhost: prepare memory regions addresses Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue Marvin Liu
2020-10-09  8:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue Marvin Liu
2020-10-12  8:21     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost add vectorized data path Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-12  9:10       ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-12  9:57         ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-10-12 13:24           ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-15 15:28       ` Liu, Yong
2020-10-15 15:35         ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/5] vhost: reuse packed ring functions Marvin Liu
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/5] vhost: prepare memory regions addresses Marvin Liu
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized dequeue Marvin Liu
2020-09-18 13:44   ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-09-21  6:26     ` Liu, Yong
2020-09-21  7:47       ` Liu, Yong [this message]
2020-08-19  3:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/5] vhost: add packed ring vectorized enqueue Marvin Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0da52623500a44eca4c9367802043cd4@intel.com \
    --to=yong.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=chenbo.xia@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).