Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] fix compilation with -Og

[Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>]

On 9/11/2017 4:13 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> In developer mode (RTE_DEVEL_BUILD=y) where -Werror is passed in the
> CFLAGS, the compilation fails with gcc-6.3.0 and EXTRA_CFLAGS=-Og. Some
> errors are real bugs (but not critical), while some are false positives
> (gcc bugs?).
> 
> The solution often consists in initializing a local variable to
> ensure the compiler won't complain.
> 
> The patchset contains all the fixes needed to properly compile with -Og.
> Feedback is welcome to decide if:
> 1/ we include all of them, even if some are workarounds for
>    gcc bugs
> 2/ we only include the real fixes, without fixing the compilation with
>    -Og.
> 
> 
> Olivier Matz (10):
>   net/bnxt: fix compilation with -Og
>   net/qede: fix compilation with -Og
>   net/virtio: fix compilation with -Og
>   net/i40e: fix compilation with -Og
>   uio: fix compilation with -Og
>   cmdline: fix compilation with -Og
>   metrics: fix compilation with -Og
>   lpm6: fix compilation with -Og
>   app/test-crypto-perf: fix memory leak
>   app/test-crypto-perf: fix compilation with -Og

Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks.

Except 3/10, 4/10, 8/10. Normally we don't get partial sets, that makes
life harder for everyone, but since mentioned ones requires some more
input I didn't want to make rest wait.

When those three concluded would you mind sending another set for them?