From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3F2A09E4; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:17:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE9F41D23; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:17:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C43A41CAF for ; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 15:17:14 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-SDR: Zsp9yEGp5Egko6DKDtVyuTDG5rtMIdN/ZfN2F8V82jedZFTHhqC4oSNEZsq1P+LKL9fQhY/ahT WZy88RvUXDXg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,9962"; a="259837208" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,242,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="259837208" Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2021 06:17:13 -0700 IronPort-SDR: T8f2HdsEPxhzSMzqqtxk6wna652VfAFz3cUQWNQgP2E86e3hCEF9NMNSzzQEQDAHv53oG0p5S1 fPN8xdmreAcg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.82,242,1613462400"; d="scan'208";a="446268408" Received: from fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.126.81]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2021 06:17:12 -0700 Received: from shsmsx606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) by fmsmsx601.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.126.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 06:17:11 -0700 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.141) by SHSMSX606.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.109.6.216) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:17:09 +0800 Received: from shsmsx601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) by SHSMSX601.ccr.corp.intel.com ([10.109.6.141]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.013; Thu, 22 Apr 2021 21:17:09 +0800 From: "Zhang, Qi Z" To: "Min Hu (Connor)" , "dev@dpdk.org" CC: "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Xing, Beilei" , "Guo, Jia" Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: fix veb index negative was not checked Thread-Index: AQHXNla2ht3pKxGNXkOD9VjSjnISJarAhs4Q Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:17:09 +0000 Message-ID: <0ef9d9912dfc4f709b791697c4949208@intel.com> References: <1618972394-14045-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> <1618972394-14045-2-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <1618972394-14045-2-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-reaction: no-action dlp-version: 11.5.1.3 dlp-product: dlpe-windows x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.36] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: fix veb index negative was not checked X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > -----Original Message----- > From: dev On Behalf Of Min Hu (Connor) > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 10:33 AM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Yigit, Ferruh ; Xing, Beilei ; > Guo, Jia > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/i40e: fix veb index negative was not > checked >=20 > From: Chengwen Feng >=20 > This patch adds checking for veb index negative when parsing veb list. >=20 > Fixes: 79f2248219c0 (net/i40e: add floating VEB option) > Cc: stable@dpdk.org >=20 > Signed-off-by: Chengwen Feng > Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) Acked-by: Qi Zhang Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel. Thanks Qi