From: Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@amd.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"Yigit, Ferruh" <Ferruh.Yigit@amd.com>,
"Agarwal, Nikhil" <nikhil.agarwal@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfio: do not coalesce DMA mappings
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2023 11:43:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0fa0e21a-3c41-6a51-4b9e-3421b63c0369@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d356823-b198-ebd1-7a28-b678ae9edaf9@intel.com>
On 4/4/2023 8:43 PM, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper
> caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On 2/7/2023 8:56 AM, Gupta, Nipun wrote:
>> [AMD Official Use Only - General]
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> I agree that change is not straightforward to review, but it should
>> not cause any functional issue as we are still creating all the memory
>> mappings, but one by one for each segment.
>> For hot plug case this causes issue as mentioned, that VFIO does not
>> allow unmap of the individual segments in case mapping was created of
>> a single coalesced segment.
>>
>> But yes, I am not sure why this code was added, which Anatoly may have
>> more understanding on.
>
> The motivation behind this code was that Linux allows limited amount of
> page mappings, so we were trying to save on those. However, since then
> there have been a few changes related to partial unmaps that may make it
> so that this code is not only no longer necessary, but is in fact
> actively harmful. I agree that this at least warrants a second look.
>
>>
>> Anatoly,
>>
>> Can you please provide your feedback on this change?
>
> The patch probably shouldn't include the mailmap changes :)
I see in "git log" that all the mailmap changes are with the patch
submitted, probably as it shows checkpatch warning, so it seems this
should be fine?
Thanks,
Nipun
>
> Could you please provide some steps to reproduce the hotplug issue
> you're having? It would be great to have a test case for this patchset
> to put it in context.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Anatoly
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-07 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-30 9:58 [PATCH] " Nipun Gupta
2023-01-04 5:19 ` [PATCH v2] " Nipun Gupta
2023-02-02 10:48 ` David Marchand
2023-02-07 8:56 ` Gupta, Nipun
2023-04-04 14:57 ` Gupta, Nipun
2023-04-04 15:13 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-04-04 16:32 ` Nipun Gupta
2023-04-05 14:16 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-04-05 15:06 ` Gupta, Nipun
2023-04-24 15:22 ` David Marchand
2023-04-24 16:10 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-04-24 16:16 ` Gupta, Nipun
2023-05-10 12:58 ` Nipun Gupta
2023-05-11 14:08 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2023-04-11 15:13 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-04-11 16:51 ` Gupta, Nipun
2023-04-07 6:13 ` Nipun Gupta [this message]
2023-04-07 7:26 ` David Marchand
2023-05-15 11:16 ` David Marchand
2023-06-29 8:21 ` [PATCH] " Ding, Xuan
2023-06-30 1:45 ` Nipun Gupta
2023-06-30 5:58 ` Ding, Xuan
2023-07-04 5:13 ` Ding, Xuan
2023-07-04 6:53 ` Gupta, Nipun
2023-07-04 8:06 ` Ding, Xuan
2023-07-04 9:23 ` Gupta, Nipun
2023-07-04 14:09 ` Thomas Monjalon
2023-07-04 16:39 ` Gupta, Nipun
2023-07-04 15:11 ` Ding, Xuan
2023-07-04 16:42 ` Gupta, Nipun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0fa0e21a-3c41-6a51-4b9e-3421b63c0369@amd.com \
--to=nipun.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=Ferruh.Yigit@amd.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nikhil.agarwal@amd.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).