From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B607A0550; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 19:02:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393B31C1D6; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 19:02:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BA61C1D4 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 19:02:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DFA687; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 13:02:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 16 Feb 2020 13:02:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=RSRmQ2A24JrwZK+HIyUqjyu9j1pw+qoCsR23/W+DInU=; b=Ff+asyyJXCLo RnPgLBLKvd118c7k+yFf6hZGjaMLyXMGO/vN6lp9V3REkIpMlHAOG5JvIkJ2S+hF Th17Z2uslFefddp3ZbVTSVzhRW2BcmlPK6uUu9ls26YxKIBLlQkMu9pwjFch4zk+ zwq3uqTYOtZdx3cnBX6JvSbjCwdHrZg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=RSRmQ2A24JrwZK+HIyUqjyu9j1pw+qoCsR23/W+DI nU=; b=daylgzcP22tSNZg1QvIK1a1H5FCd0yzLh1CI5cUjEevhSHa827XgIOW/v 2u6iPh4lIEbgsRXzf3nFkuF3N3yzrvoA8uMkYPpH+mrUoRxhyCP3XhcL6HeQ/6GI LCR/E/IxmYJsdH6fEMbcMH273Bq+5Ur5LGj/vXaaiFjRdr8R2lNLw5XFkEmKkqBu fSm8OJs9pTMUliSNNqlWR0n3DXfbP05dlykYMjJUUR5cFxz1Zog4dLgMkn0nVEyb sLesqhzoG886q8YbESWY1+Er2Us1fJZlo3uR5ZryeYt4C4kODW6pd+Da/uh3Wsom jvxa0wMw9h+aNgVXT4CfyMYZ+n/ig== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrjeeggddutdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuff homhgrihhnpehprhgvfhhigidrthhonecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeen ucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomh grshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A3E323060BE4; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 13:02:32 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ye Xiaolong Cc: John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , Stephen Hemminger Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 19:02:31 +0100 Message-ID: <10012834.3WhfQktd6Z@xps> In-Reply-To: <20200216172938.GA61057@intel.com> References: <20191129081911.92988-1-xiaolong.ye@intel.com> <2438326.H8VbNj7W2P@xps> <20200216172938.GA61057@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] doc: introduce openwrt how-to guide X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 16/02/2020 18:29, Ye Xiaolong: > On 02/16, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >18/01/2020 06:48, Xiaolong Ye: > >[...] > >> + [binaries] > >> + c = 'x86_64-openwrt-linux-gcc' > >> + cpp = 'x86_64-openwrt-linux-cpp' > >> + ar = 'x86_64-openwrt-linux-ar' > >> + strip = 'x86_64-openwrt-linux-strip' > >> + > >> + meson builddir --cross-file openwrt-cross > > > >This is really a good example why meson should allow to override the toolchain prefix. > > Not sure whether I get your point or not, do you mean meson should support > something like "cross = 'x86_64-openwrt-linux-'" in config file (just like the > CROSS_COMPILE for make build system), so we don't need to override the build > tools one by one? Yes, I think meson should support CROSS_COMPILE environment variable or a similar config option. I don't see the point of creating a new config file for each toolchain prefix. > >> + to /usr/lib64 in OpenWrt. > > > >libnuma is not packaged in OpenWrt? > > Unfortunately not, I guess the reason maybe OpenWrt is mainly focused on low-end > embedded systems which don't have numa support. I would be nice to work on it in OpenWrt project then.