DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: enable next abi in static libs
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 15:18:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <10048439.cxXN29b43P@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435874746-32095-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>

Any comment or ack?

2015-07-03 00:05, Thomas Monjalon:
> When a change makes really hard to keep ABI compatibility,
> instead of waiting next release to break the ABI, it is smoother
> to introduce the new code and enable it only for static libraries.
> The flag RTE_NEXT_ABI may be used to "ifdef" the new code.
> When the release is out, a dynamically linked application can use
> the new shared libraries without rebuild while developpers can prepare
> their application for the next ABI by reading the deprecation notice
> and easily testing the new code.
> When starting the next release cycle, the "ifdefs" will be removed
> and the ABI break will be marked by incrementing LIBABIVER.
> 
> The new option CONFIG_RTE_NEXT_ABI is not defined in the configuration
> templates because it is deduced from CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB.
> It is automatically enabled for static libraries and disabled for
> shared libraries.
> It can be forced to another value by editing the generated .config file.
> It shouldn't be enabled for shared libraries because it would break the
> ABI without changing the version number LIBABIVER. That's why a warning
> is printed in this case.
> 
> The guideline is also updated to integrate this new possibility.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-06 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-02 22:05 Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-06 13:18 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2015-07-06 13:35   ` Neil Horman
2015-07-06 13:49     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-06 18:22       ` Neil Horman
2015-07-06 21:44         ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-07 11:14           ` Neil Horman
2015-07-07 12:46             ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-07 13:11               ` Neil Horman
2015-07-07 13:44               ` Neil Horman
2015-07-10 16:07                 ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-11 14:19                   ` Neil Horman
2015-07-13 10:14                     ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-08 14:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] next abi option Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 14:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] mk: remove variables identical to config ones Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 14:55   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] mk: enable next abi preview Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 16:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-13  7:32       ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-13  8:48         ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-13  9:02           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: fix shared lib build with stable abi Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-13  9:24             ` Mcnamara, John
2015-07-13  9:32               ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 16:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] next abi option Neil Horman
2015-07-08 22:58     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=10048439.cxXN29b43P@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).