DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
To: Matan Azrad <matan@nvidia.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: dev <dev@dpdk.org>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: fix configuration mutex cleanup
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 13:38:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1052520c-61e9-2135-bbad-9d009f52ce4b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MW2PR12MB24924AA868DBA3ACB1103513DFA80@MW2PR12MB2492.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Matan,

On 1/14/21 12:49 PM, Matan Azrad wrote:
> Hi Maxime and David
> 
> Thank you for Review.
> 
> From: David Marchand
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:48 AM David Marchand
>> <david.marchand@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> I wonder if it would be possible and cleaner to disable cancellation
>>>> on the thread while the mutex is held?
> 
> Yes, we can cause thread to return by some global variable sync.
> It is the same logic.

No, that was not my suggestion. My suggestion is to block the thread
cancellation while in the critical section, using
pthread_setcancelstate().


>>> +1
>>
>> IEEE Std 1003.1-2001/Cor 2-2004, item XBD/TC2/D6/26 is applied, adding
>> pthread_t to the list of types that are not required to be arithmetic types, thus
>> allowing pthread_t to be defined as a structure.
>>
>> It would be better to leave pthread_t alone and not interpret it:
>>
>> if (priv->timer_tid) {
>>     pthread_cancel(priv->timer_tid);
>>     pthread_join(priv->timer_tid, &status); }
>> priv->timer_tid = 0;
> 
> 
> I'm not sure why you think it is better in this specific case.
> The cancellation will close the thread in faster way, no need to wait for the thread to close itself.
> 
> 
>>
>> --
>> David Marchand
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-14 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-06  6:43 [dpdk-dev] " Matan Azrad
2021-01-07 18:09 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-01-08  8:48   ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " David Marchand
2021-01-14  8:34     ` David Marchand
2021-01-14 11:49       ` Matan Azrad
2021-01-14 12:38         ` Maxime Coquelin [this message]
2021-01-14 13:09           ` Matan Azrad
2021-01-14 14:27             ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-01-14 15:23               ` Matan Azrad
2021-01-21 10:46                 ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-01-21 20:13                   ` Matan Azrad
2021-01-26 10:22                     ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-01-26 10:45                       ` Matan Azrad
2021-01-26 13:00                         ` Maxime Coquelin
2021-01-26 18:23                           ` Matan Azrad
2021-01-27 10:45 ` [dpdk-dev] " Maxime Coquelin
2021-01-27 12:01 ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1052520c-61e9-2135-bbad-9d009f52ce4b@redhat.com \
    --to=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).