From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024DA2E8F; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:24:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BF121B55; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:24:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:24:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=nrEPMy3WbdUnCSflQ6TRfJUoMQ2Z0+318WcKkOUc7gM=; b=ideIJCRGs2U5 A0SDs55EXJiqTou2UgUNH9+PxPYKfak6RhyJCwRLE+EbfTooVzVWpP0YGq6UtqCm wLvybpJ238HSz8IZbWJZQA0wSKrFmn5xbWQSe/tlDg3z+C4sAG1hP5KEKJjwZZRS BWjAvdDGUTHOCemSYFwaquqm9YPTaNw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=nrEPMy3WbdUnCSflQ6TRfJUoMQ2Z0+318WcKkOUc7 gM=; b=xgi+ppirn+HkxP9kDhLaQ2yGX/hL5+VGq50JJEsJiid6wwhwxay2MRnn+ V3LIuvjvQuLbdBPBdlMttYb5GBNipnS61t4LHpjD/lkgAzqjSLO40/6EuR7r9ZP+ mxxKD93CkMTKktNkf/AmydlelnKd7WZxh9l28AvHBjsCzbt2lV06Lgiz/w2PmtRw 5gOZllXwHU9Svau//1HAUpokQr+uFF2rrMaao2SdKMxbDuNjWP5zstFLZbvSafuS LPshWYcDGYHQea16qY1B/W8Dw2hrhZc6uYYAlzsXi8kutwqH3MC+dQskX/8aAPfx lfA1PxSoGR3vibwleUr2f8zb9n3zA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledruddtuddgvdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfquhhtnecuuegrihhlohhuthemucef tddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjg hfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcu oehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepughpughkrd horhhgnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiii gvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 11D5CE4652; Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:24:34 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ferruh Yigit , Rami Rosen Cc: dev@dpdk.org, naga.sureshx.somarowthu@intel.com, reshma.pattan@intel.com, dpdk-stable Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 12:24:33 +0100 Message-ID: <10690305.j51yestHYH@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20190211183859.12314-1-ramirose@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] test: fix broken "make test" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:24:37 -0000 12/02/2019 10:36, Ferruh Yigit: > On 2/11/2019 6:38 PM, Rami Rosen wrote: > > This patch fixes a broken build; when running > > make test > > we get the following error: > > ... > > Traceback (most recent call last): > > File "/work/src/dpdk-19.02/test/test/autotest.py", line 49, in > > num_fails = runner.run_all_tests() > > File "/work/src/dpdk-19.02/test/test/autotest_runner.py", line 345, in > > run_all_tests > > self.parallel_tests) > > File "/work/src/dpdk-19.02/test/test/autotest_runner.py", line 264, in > > __filter_test > > test_cmd = test["Command"] > > KeyError: 'Command' > > ... > > The reason is that the pdump autotest entry uses "Comamnd" > > instead of "Command"; this patch fixes it. > > > > Bugzilla ID: 205 > > Fixes: 086eb64db39e ("test/pdump: add unit test for pdump library") > > Signed-off-by: Rami Rosen > > Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit > > Good catch! But it seems 19.02 released autotest broken, so this needs to be > backported to 19.02: > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org Applied, thanks > Thomas, > What do you think adding autotest into DPDK community lab testing? I will bring > the the suggestion in next meeting. Yes, sure. It has already been discussed but no task was created: https://bugs.dpdk.org/buglist.cgi?product=lab Let's follow-up in next meeting.