From: "John Daley (johndale)" <johndale@cisco.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] removing mbuf error flags
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:47:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <111147af75124b6cbac6aa3e628cded9@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <572352A3.6030400@6wind.com>
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olivier Matz [mailto:olivier.matz@6wind.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 5:25 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; John Daley
> (johndale) <johndale@cisco.com>
> Subject: removing mbuf error flags
>
> Hi,
>
> In rte_mbuf.h, some rx flags are set to 0 since a long time since nearly 2
> years. It means nobody use them. They were introduced by the following
> commit:
>
> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=c22265f6
>
> As far as I understand, these flags were introduced to let the application
> know that a received packet is invalid.
>
> The 2 drivers using them are i40e and enic. But as this flags are 0 today, it
> means that invalid packets are silently given to the application.
>
> My opinion is that invalid packets should not be given to the application and
> only a statistic counter should be incremented.
> No application check these flags today (in examples, or testpmd).
>
> I would like to remove these flags.
> Thoughs?
I agree. Enic needs a little work to increment a counter and update internal indexes correctly. If you are in a hurry, feel free to 's/PKT_RX_MAC_ERR/0/' in enic for now.
-John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-29 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-29 12:25 Olivier Matz
2016-04-29 17:47 ` John Daley (johndale) [this message]
2016-04-29 18:16 ` Don Provan
2016-04-29 18:24 ` Jay Rolette
2016-04-29 20:00 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2016-04-29 20:57 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-04-30 1:41 ` Don Provan
2016-05-10 8:40 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC] mbuf: remove unused rx " Olivier Matz
2016-05-12 1:32 ` John Daley (johndale)
2016-05-12 9:25 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-05-23 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mbuf: remove unused Rx " Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 11:39 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 12:39 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-13 14:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-13 12:42 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-06-13 12:49 ` Olivier Matz
2016-06-13 13:25 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-06-13 13:52 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=111147af75124b6cbac6aa3e628cded9@XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com \
--to=johndale@cisco.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).