From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kni: support for MAC addr change
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 13:55:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1146be98-43a9-91f5-8ad2-53ae31b48b4c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512042367-6361-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
On 11/30/2017 3:46 AM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> This patch adds following:
> 1. Option to configure the mac address during create. Generate random
> address only if the user has not provided any valid address.
> 2. Inform usespace, if mac address is being changed in linux.
> 3. Implement default handling of mac address change in the corresponding
> ethernet device.>
> Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Overall lgtm, there are a few issues commented below.
Thanks,
ferruh
<...>
> @@ -269,11 +275,15 @@ The code for allocating the kernel NIC interfaces for a specific port is as foll
> conf.addr = dev_info.pci_dev->addr;
> conf.id = dev_info.pci_dev->id;
>
> + /* Get the interface default mac address */
> + rte_eth_macaddr_get(port_id, struct ether_addr *)&conf.mac_addr);
a parentheses is missing, good to fix although this is document :)
<...>
> @@ -587,3 +603,26 @@ Currently, setting a new MTU and configuring the network interface (up/ down) ar
> RTE_LOG(ERR, APP, "Failed to start port %d\n", port_id);
> return ret;
> }
> +
> + /* Callback for request of configuring device mac address */
> +
> + static int
> + kni_config_mac_address(uint16_t port_id, uint8_t mac_addr[])
> + {
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + if (port_id >= rte_eth_dev_count() || port_id >= RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS) {
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, KNI, "Invalid port id %d\n", port_id);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + RTE_LOG(INFO, KNI, "Configure mac address of %d", port_id);
> + /* Configure network interface mac address */
> + ret = rte_eth_dev_default_mac_addr_set(port_id,
> + (struct ether_addr *)mac_addr);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + RTE_LOG(ERR, KNI, "Failed to config mac_addr for port %d\n",
> + port_id);
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
It is hard to maintain code in doc, I am aware other related code is already in
document but what do you think keeping this minimal, like:
static int
kni_config_mac_address(uint16_t port_id, uint8_t mac_addr[])
{
....
}
<...>
> @@ -559,6 +583,14 @@ rte_kni_handle_request(struct rte_kni *kni)
> req->result = kni->ops.config_network_if(\
> kni->ops.port_id, req->if_up);
> break;
> + case RTE_KNI_REQ_CHANGE_MAC_ADDR: /* Change MAC Address */
> + if (kni->ops.config_mac_address)
> + req->result = kni->ops.config_mac_address(
> + kni->ops.port_id, req->mac_addr);
> + else
> + req->result = kni_config_mac_address(
> + kni->ops.port_id, req->mac_addr);
ops.port_id can be unset if there is no physically backing device the kni
interface. And I guess for that case port_id will be 0 and it will corrupt other
interface's data. There needs to find a way to handle the port_id not set case.
Since kni sample always creates a KNI interface backed by pyhsical device, this
is not an issue for kni sample app but please think about kni pmd case.
<...>
> @@ -87,6 +91,7 @@ struct rte_kni_conf {
> unsigned mbuf_size; /* mbuf size */
> struct rte_pci_addr addr;
> struct rte_pci_id id;
> + char mac_addr[ETHER_ADDR_LEN]; /* MAC address assigned to KNI */
>
> __extension__
> uint8_t force_bind : 1; /* Flag to bind kernel thread */
"struct rte_kni_conf" is a public struct. Adding a variable into the middle of
the struct will break the ABI.
But I think it is OK to add to the end, unless struct is not used as array.
<...>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-22 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 11:46 Hemant Agrawal
2017-11-30 11:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] kni: add support for promisc mode set Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-22 21:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-30 11:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] kni: set initial value for MTU Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-22 22:01 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-12-22 21:55 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-12-26 10:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] kni: support for MAC addr change Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-26 10:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-26 10:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] kni: add support for promisc mode set Hemant Agrawal
2017-12-26 10:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] kni: set initial value for MTU Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-18 6:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] kni: support for MAC addr change Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-18 6:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] kni: add support for promisc mode set Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-18 6:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] kni: set initial value for MTU Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-21 22:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] kni: support for MAC addr change Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-22 5:20 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-01-22 15:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-02-01 0:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1146be98-43a9-91f5-8ad2-53ae31b48b4c@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).