From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C678BA0A02; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:28:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9DB4067B; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:28:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D5A4014F for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:28:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910BD5C00F4; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:28:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:28:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= huIpX7uPtOgCaK12Ze9mXX6Ig69tUuRbaYvBTYyT8kY=; b=M4exEki6BphekT3y npfYrwVO/VzqljwGzXnv9q3uaKPXb6Fj+bz3wqs7561iEmKDfh5p73QkJ7bPBaWF 1dxuCncbnCxG5GjudyZ/K6pCblJPskZHCvPI66IIu658wuqEu8C9iTADOfjK2kCz YuZ8981nX2ghGEJxNXIcxZKRl4iCZb7HGseuDNs3luyg42EJr/tVMBYsVnzXraZi xm6X0ZKgKd0P74wkR2Z2as3l70G9G0t/QWkt3DWwKE/2pCvNT2WEnPWTo5YASL0h AkPW5FH4RqAmdiD0R2hTjM5Gotykj6E1C5Rc2Q2ordWHH2C4pcisoh+fu07mo+w/ k3UGpg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=huIpX7uPtOgCaK12Ze9mXX6Ig69tUuRbaYvBTYyT8 kY=; b=akQB4Sz2SbgjIRsEe2lJ+G6ug+3FIdup4fiJpzYp0VOhE6yDuGNqTsevS S9v84br13aKU6MOSOA3Jft9Z+poFBywsGBhAO6RsI1VjLZDuKEvW0Dw1OyEJfpAC kaWcuip7CPdKFfyVsls7D8f77avuYAKq6z3NbWUX7I5LOFHW/u8ZnRwf2LfXggtQ GxV5vb9kCxbk1+0uxqIv7W6s4bWJlBHQMq5HPFojbmPwp9evTbJ+mX9CgLFXfjB3 moJxIHj6Y3WUNFtV7IVNOyaQkRlfziHZiH/iYUtw7gz61+jXTCJ9K1TDCBJK8gGG hVzOzPoIOixa69O2KcsbvHAYCM8RA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudegkedgudeglecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdej ueeiiedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgr lhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8D63B240425; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:28:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Vladimir Medvedkin Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 22:28:44 +0100 Message-ID: <118983719.HxGbWRN4Bm@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] add new kv hash table X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 08/05/2020 21:58, Vladimir Medvedkin: > Currently DPDK has a special implementation of a hash table for > 4 byte keys which is called FBK hash. Unfortunately its main drawback > is that it only supports 2 byte values. > The new implementation called KV hash > supports 4 byte keys and 8 byte associated values, > which is enough to store a pointer. Waiting for a v5. Is it abandoned?