From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94645A0350; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 19:30:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3996F1C2AC; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 19:30:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3500F1C1BF for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 19:30:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C9C46C; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:29:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:29:59 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= Pti9W+Sk5SI5m7EP5QdwGNUfkKdiCsq888a2aV0i1u4=; b=C0Vg6QZfyhSGtw+o 0TZuuFLT33sSNl/D+9CfEg9fdkEsA/gOlIoJdyb9wt07N6LmppBAdXITLzz09CU/ GdcsYk5lK4BbDA4vEM/wbZJCAZrGx1UHqF3kAlRFzxmuZUD+5gGYzZ7qybbEezVq wVvcEqteJdxRr+Q95I8TUbDRvrbgm0Gf57wJBQRJKx2NpoDN1zyvV7tRF9Xi8k/b N/xa4PYQgGawiV+foOuKbs0JreSFZThjQOBz51cMKkyhiDtwSjWE5DnHAYjvaJyU wiJ81y/FEXptrNGwgFyQBCMdby3YIvsLCGY1p2Li3hghZbCpiXuIQt+6UGvoH0Lm sC3LnA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Pti9W+Sk5SI5m7EP5QdwGNUfkKdiCsq888a2aV0i1 u4=; b=dVEcoZTePUV+7L4yIfruFtuzLCGWVf40bxZplXNhMk5RTk0ccs9PNEEyP lgMd6QF+O3mCq4SnpQPPziFVVpDxQyd010aAZDq7cdRYAGSW3XflLlkBgryErIO3 obdG0waI07EtmswJHZv72DwNyo/cYHDnzNjWih5733cv4SBp4MT32a2lLZD1f9/h r1yU5WYLm7XnSjxD484Q9mVIo5kuWmrHpOdEvZEO2+h7ox43Iayjx/q6TF/WlESg kUMzlhsDBx25u0tVC5QKMVdRWrI5n04kw+azC232En/aPcY+oi5nP3AeScHKZ2E9 HEhMAMnJjiXugv14iQdm7+jifwOHA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrtddvgdduudehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D6D153060062; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 13:29:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Pai G, Sunil" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Stokes, Ian" Cc: "Richardson, Bruce" , "bluca@debian.org" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "ktraynor@redhat.com" , "Richardson, Bruce" Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 19:29:54 +0200 Message-ID: <12061792.tHt7C13mB3@thomas> In-Reply-To: <52156197ADF84D4FB1B836FA75938A8918E9B1BE@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20200429100831.398-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <52156197ADF84D4FB1B836FA75938A8918E9B1BE@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] improve DPDK static builds with meson X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 30/06/2020 18:37, Stokes, Ian: > > This series allows OVS to consume the DPDK libraries appropriately (static and > > shared) and simplifies the build. > > When building OVS with DPDK, without this patch, the linker would always pick > > the shared libraries over static even after specifying the -Bstatic flag. > > With this patch, no such behavior is observed. So, it would be very helpful for > > the OVS community if this patch is merged in DPDK. > > > > I would also ask this series to be back ported to 19.11 as OVS can immediately > > consume it on the latest master instead of waiting on the next DPDK release i.e > > 20.11 > > +1, if this would be possible to apply to 19.11 as a backport it would enable OVS to move quicker and update the OVS Travis as well as docs and build scripts rather than waiting for DPDK 20.11. Sunil has already been working on these changes I believe. > > Alternatively if it cant be backported to 19.11, then possibly we could look at merging Sunil's patches to the dpdk-latest branch in OVS once makefiles are deprecated in DPDK master? Why waiting for makefiles to be deprecated? These patches are merged in latest DPDK, so you can proceed in OVS.