From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728511B90B for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:06:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166BE23161; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:06:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:06:07 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=SqQWlfoXeFnPEOnFOUtS1ijT5DTyrLcsZ5E2OmVw+j0=; b=RSUPrSsrGGXK +bxhFV6a9aaIp2IBI/d7BmV8d/1zfh5BbjYKjUimICLSk6pJ4uSxA2WZgJAV0EUy AjphtZqyt+8IAOrKkkdMdSwAqlyX8KfkAYYNdc5Dl9paSeF9R5k5FpVsvMOu/yLf mPZsoNBoAW62Ves22ctOjdVXw/5WxsU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=SqQWlfoXeFnPEOnFOUtS1ijT5DTyrLcsZ5E2OmVw+ j0=; b=dxB0aES58tbNi18YXfAelDH3E56q6koWJu+7CPo9ULlIqKxxv+2mxbdfl Gkbn5/ZunZQ/freoCR/zOW2/499ybSa8SGqIeaFbqpEHslljDK+S2Vla4ZfSNOn4 Dd0aGXOpPrc6FfEq3VGTHNYHl32bW7HASgt7wIwenk2fs5VQDZlbESIgdRHHXwNV IlfJVh6KMspHHSEcoDJXvDpN/bamb6krx9c+lnnYWYon7zJPMNs72r+iMKKYJoKj f8h1xQTQe0PafbwMW6YzSQQBURkJPW5QjkgVGW6CXtyx9dUXvFqgAFtIbaChVudp myMWpATOSAuBbrxbw1mOkrqAveKKQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrfeefgdejfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedt tdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfh gggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceo thhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfe drudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 970D5E4043; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 10:06:05 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Cristian Dumitrescu Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Jasvinder Singh Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:06:04 +0100 Message-ID: <12279762.qgYkyOx5tf@xps> In-Reply-To: <20190110132625.118111-1-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> References: <20190103160432.147027-1-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> <20190110132625.118111-1-cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] net/softnic: add support for service cores X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 15:06:07 -0000 10/01/2019 14:26, Cristian Dumitrescu: > Add support to run the Soft NIC device on service cores, based on the > value of the sc parameter: > > 0: The current Soft NIC device is run explicitly by the application. The > firmware creates one or several pipelines for this dev and maps them > to CPU cores that should not be service cores. The app is required to > call rte_pmd_softnic_run() to make this dev work. > > 1 (default): The current device is run on the service cores transparently > to the app. The firmware creates one or several pipelines for this dev > current device and maps them to CPU cores that should be service cores. > Each of these service cores is calling rte_pmd_softnic_run() > in order to make this dev work with no app intervention. > > Signed-off-by: Cristian Dumitrescu > Signed-off-by: Jasvinder Singh > --- > Changes in v3: > -re-added the commit message lost in v2 by mistake > > Changes in v2: > -fixed compilation for some 32-bit targets by removing the need for > function pointer conversion Applied, thanks