From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from forward1h.mail.yandex.net (forward1h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.146]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3219AA5 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:55:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from web12h.yandex.ru (web12h.yandex.ru [84.201.186.41]) by forward1h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id DFB2E9E0B2E for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:54:52 +0300 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web12h.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 78CBAC21165; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:54:52 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1424858092; bh=vZxQNheWMNbku+Aurj4ju4f9sOmASlD/ELUvnTampTk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=tdw8alZfu+QdECTMJxVLyirjbOaBWcJsu7mpaUpxgQKcsU0bIjKIyyTqDHobwfbp6 /LYEiO1nOXAT3wNJXRnkh8H6wKC5Ixnd3m0AsVsBkKgxfHzAQ6BN2mStC2/0NOxy66 GlXYYfhSj5u7AHEzgTRBMeq+1CvWHIAUKjWx0ltU= Received: by web12h.yandex.ru with HTTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:54:51 +0300 From: Jog Lie To: dev@dpdk.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1234251424858091@web12h.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:54:51 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Subject: [dpdk-dev] dpdk - poll mode - context switches X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:55:36 -0000 Hello, I am not sure to understand the mechanism behind dpdk concerning the context switches. I have two user space applications that need access to the NIC according to incoming port rules (port 80 and port 443). How to be sure that DPDK spreads the load to the right application ? Will 2 dpdk instances be needed (one per app) -> two incoming packets analysis to "know" if the packet should be forwarded to the user space process ? Which would basically be the same thing as inefficient promiscuous mode. i don't understand that "filtering" point. Could you please clarify ? Thanks --š Jog