DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: orika@nvidia.com, Dekel Peled <dekelp@nvidia.com>
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com,
	konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com,
	wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, beilei.xing@intel.com,
	bernard.iremonger@intel.com, matan@nvidia.com,
	shahafs@nvidia.com, viacheslavo@nvidia.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	asafp@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/11] ethdev: add extensions attributes to IPv6 item
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 22:41:56 +0200
Message-ID: <12619574.BvRjRT2TxV@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <97bc93abb2093db8eebba0fbe1b9692afb1e7095.1602494556.git.dekelp@nvidia.com>

12/10/2020 12:43, Dekel Peled:
> - * Note: IPv6 options are handled by dedicated pattern items, see
> - * RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6_EXT.
> + * Dedicated flags indicate existence of specific extension headers.
> + * Every type of extension header can use a dedicated pattern item, or
> + * the generic item RTE_FLOW_ITEM_TYPE_IPV6_EXT.

I don't understand this last sentence.

>   */
>  struct rte_flow_item_ipv6 {
>  	struct rte_ipv6_hdr hdr; /**< IPv6 header definition. */
> +	uint32_t hop_ext_exist:1;
> +	/**< Hop-by-Hop Options extension header exists. */
> +	uint32_t rout_ext_exist:1;

"rout" looks weird. Would be "route" appropriate?

> +	/**< Routing extension header exists. */
> +	uint32_t frag_ext_exist:1;
> +	/**< Fragment extension header exists. */
> +	uint32_t auth_ext_exist:1;
> +	/**< Authentication extension header exists. */
> +	uint32_t esp_ext_exist:1;
> +	/**< Encapsulation Security Payload extension header exists. */
> +	uint32_t dest_ext_exist:1;
> +	/**< Destination Options extension header exists. */
> +	uint32_t mobil_ext_exist:1;
> +	/**< Mobility extension header exists. */
> +	uint32_t hip_ext_exist:1;
> +	/**< Host Identity Protocol extension header exists. */
> +	uint32_t shim6_ext_exist:1;
> +	/**< Shim6 Protocol extension header exists. */

About the field names, the "_exist" suffix is pretty clear,
but without being able to say why, I feel it is a strange name.
I was thinking about renaming the fields with a "has_" prefix.
Does it look better?



  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-12 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 101+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-30 14:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] support match on L3 fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-09-30 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/10] ethdev: add extensions attributes to IPv6 item Dekel Peled
2020-09-30 14:54   ` Ori Kam
2020-09-30 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/10] ethdev: add IPv6 fragment extension header item Dekel Peled
2020-09-30 14:55   ` Ori Kam
2020-09-30 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/10] app/testpmd: support IPv4 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-09-30 14:54   ` Ori Kam
2020-09-30 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/10] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-09-30 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/10] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragment extension item Dekel Peled
2020-09-30 14:56   ` Ori Kam
2020-09-30 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/10] net/mlx5: remove handling of ICMP fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-09-30 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/10] net/mlx5: support match on IPv4 fragment packets Dekel Peled
2020-09-30 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/10] net/mlx5: support match on IPv6 " Dekel Peled
2020-09-30 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/10] net/mlx5: support match on IPv6 fragment ext. item Dekel Peled
2020-09-30 14:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/10] doc: update release notes for MLX5 L3 frag support Dekel Peled
2020-10-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/11] support match on L3 fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-01 21:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/11] ethdev: add extensions attributes to IPv6 item Dekel Peled
2020-10-04 13:45     ` Ori Kam
2020-10-01 21:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/11] ethdev: add IPv6 fragment extension header item Dekel Peled
2020-10-01 21:27     ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-10-01 21:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/11] app/testpmd: support IPv4 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-04 13:47     ` Ori Kam
2020-10-01 21:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/11] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-04 13:49     ` Ori Kam
2020-10-01 21:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/11] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragment extension item Dekel Peled
2020-10-04 13:47     ` Ori Kam
2020-10-01 21:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/11] net/mlx5: remove handling of ICMP fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-04 13:49     ` Ori Kam
2020-10-01 21:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv4 fragment packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-04 13:48     ` Ori Kam
2020-10-01 21:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 08/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv6 " Dekel Peled
2020-10-01 21:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv6 fragment ext. item Dekel Peled
2020-10-04 13:51     ` Ori Kam
2020-10-01 21:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/11] doc: update release notes for MLX5 L3 frag support Dekel Peled
2020-10-04 13:55     ` Ori Kam
2020-10-01 21:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 11/11] net/mlx5: enforce limitation on IPv6 next proto Dekel Peled
2020-10-04 13:55     ` Ori Kam
2020-10-05  8:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/11] support match on L3 fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/11] ethdev: add extensions attributes to IPv6 item Dekel Peled
2020-10-06 23:43       ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-10-07  6:59         ` Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/11] ethdev: add IPv6 fragment extension header item Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:50       ` Ori Kam
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/11] app/testpmd: support IPv4 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/11] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/11] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragment extension item Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/11] net/mlx5: remove handling of ICMP fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv4 fragment packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv6 " Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:51       ` Ori Kam
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv6 fragment ext. item Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/11] doc: update release notes for MLX5 L3 frag support Dekel Peled
2020-10-05  8:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 11/11] net/mlx5: enforce limitation on IPv6 next proto Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/11] support match on L3 fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/11] ethdev: add extensions attributes to IPv6 item Dekel Peled
2020-10-08  3:14         ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-10-08  7:03           ` Dekel Peled
2020-10-08 18:28         ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/11] ethdev: add IPv6 fragment extension header item Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/11] app/testpmd: support IPv4 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/11] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/11] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragment extension item Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/11] net/mlx5: remove handling of ICMP fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv4 fragment packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv6 " Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv6 fragment ext. item Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/11] doc: update release notes for MLX5 L3 frag support Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 10:54       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 11/11] net/mlx5: enforce limitation on IPv6 next proto Dekel Peled
2020-10-07 11:15       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/11] support match on L3 fragmented packets Ori Kam
2020-10-12 10:42       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/11] ethdev: add extensions attributes to IPv6 item Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 20:41           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-10-13  8:22             ` Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/11] ethdev: add IPv6 fragment extension header item Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 20:50           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-13  8:11             ` Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/11] app/testpmd: support IPv4 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/11] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/11] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragment extension item Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/11] net/mlx5: remove handling of ICMP fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 07/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv4 fragment packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv6 " Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/11] net/mlx5: support match on IPv6 fragment ext. item Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/11] doc: update release notes for MLX5 L3 frag support Dekel Peled
2020-10-12 19:29           ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-12 10:43         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 11/11] net/mlx5: enforce limitation on IPv6 next proto Dekel Peled
2020-10-13 13:32         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/5] support match on L3 fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-13 13:32           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/5] ethdev: add extensions attributes to IPv6 item Dekel Peled
2020-10-14 10:36             ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-13 13:32           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/5] ethdev: add IPv6 fragment extension header item Dekel Peled
2020-10-14 10:37             ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-10-13 13:32           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/5] app/testpmd: support IPv4 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-13 13:32           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/5] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-13 13:32           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/5] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragment extension item Dekel Peled
2020-10-14 16:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/5] support match on L3 fragmented packets Dekel Peled
2020-10-14 16:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/5] ethdev: add extensions attributes to IPv6 item Dekel Peled
2020-10-14 16:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/5] ethdev: add IPv6 fragment extension header item Dekel Peled
2020-10-14 16:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/5] app/testpmd: support IPv4 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-14 16:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/5] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragments Dekel Peled
2020-10-14 16:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/5] app/testpmd: support IPv6 fragment extension item Dekel Peled
2020-10-14 17:18   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/5] support match on L3 fragmented packets Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12619574.BvRjRT2TxV@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=asafp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=bernard.iremonger@intel.com \
    --cc=dekelp@nvidia.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=orika@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

DPDK patches and discussions

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/0 dev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 dev dev/ https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev \
		dev@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index dev

Example config snippet for mirrors.
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.dev


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git