Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>]

2014-04-30 11:22, Neil Horman:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:09:38PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The 4 spec files are used to build 4 different git trees with their own
> > versioning:
> > 	http://dpdk.org/browse
> > 
> > So I think it's saner to keep them in their repository.
[...]
> 
> Yeah, if they're separate git trees, they can be separate specs.  That said
> though, it strongly begs the question as to why you are keeping open source
> pmds outside of the dpdk library?  That really doesn't make much sense, 
> whats preventing that integration (followed by the integration of the spec
> files)?

These extensions have their own versioning.
They include PMD but also kernel modules (memnic and vmxnet3-usermap).
In case of memnic, the kernel module is an alternative to DPDK PMD. So there 
is no good reason to integrate it in DPDK. And it's better to host both 
drivers together in order to keep coherency and share some resources.
Extensions can also be a place to host some test applications related to its 
PMD.

If you see DPDK as a framework, it's really logical to have repositories 
hosting some projects which are (partly) using the framework.

-- 
Thomas