From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1031B5E4 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:07:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C34C22709; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 19:07:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 09 Jan 2019 19:07:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=9sjzjALek/waOhBt7eOMZEa/PT518GxsnGQMSdJ6JVk=; b=a1sv/RWk1Gef YBZpNjRlt7pE8S+TEB1eegIq7bXLTDu+7Bj30yGfZOBtIQilsNdaP03N3xwj1MK4 oaQEW+OC/bGyUjfhT4n+acF8z9vNM/hBSalmfLz0XKE8HR0tOkass6aHBNKU63yw +uhzwNsofHE6Av/mGSHH5d48YAgZ6Zc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=9sjzjALek/waOhBt7eOMZEa/PT518GxsnGQMSdJ6J Vk=; b=ArhAgqZ5x3ZkvSBeDtpdAHN6KFyZDtr+6e6EZgTeZkQaOsintuigKKFbr ScrJUFxXtceBFFLojXgvUe38w9oW7fxtkk2V/XC+J+mwoeAuJtjbC9+ku+OXbyJM xl2/C6yOSyLXf/6uvURYG89HVq69mqYQFjL7WMpulKYZRDtardr5+FQg62s1ZQ+8 tLn8rjDQWawetwmXvmdEVRwV7WWGF0sjnAavkfn2SvhRQuW9OBfgKsr8sA4Gvi/5 qDB5klrS4ZNs4z1jFyiTV0Rw7H3ir8FAwIijn0rzgKVZcz5TVKoHz32a5Owt+P5F rB5m6/DbG3NHysH0AjOUlLF4E0vyw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrfedvgdduieculddtuddrgedtkedrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuff homhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecu rfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtne cuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 45C5AE435E; Wed, 9 Jan 2019 19:07:57 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Daniel Waddington Cc: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 01:07:56 +0100 Message-ID: <12786706.2di15EqK5T@xps> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK on IBM Power9 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 00:07:59 -0000 Hi, 09/01/2019 23:25, Daniel Waddington: > Hi, > I'm trying to run DPDK 18.11 on IBM Power9. Should it run? (I'n new to DPDK on Power). As mentioned in the release notes, Power9 is supported: http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/rel_notes/release_18_11.html#known-issues We are missing a strong support from IBM. Several requests were already sent. Given your email address, you should be able to forward the need ;)