From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAAFA00C2; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:40:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE7A4068E; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:40:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379F44068B; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:40:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79505C021D; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:40:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 08 Mar 2022 06:40:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; bh=gDFgCrlUXwUtxQ 7P/TEZExHRl5yqegLD4qx03WPBsY0=; b=Q8r2sYMJVfg42LknqDOtemlNCDSc9c /CrjpZ2WVMsGmMadsDPVwVQROwh9s4WgyPTkIqOXyqPPixji/zpJ7soe66La4BjZ aNxJ1x/NE7N+Ytl64g7N3CDwvpNQDma9oUsNmukoYyfY51ly1lkpIhsSCGdxdSMs sRHowrZGiev7nsBK4l7OoWdtsOi90N5jsvmU6nVrvHX8IeMTUBKdU2zPbpG7T2fn wZmm1ILpvPAxRpKU+HOfUoAzxAOERXXry0uaxohRozhApeRBDWSw2me0u82o/+Dc AqZjeXL7aLs2yL+c59wgSDs2/n1h/HQiSCR8ZrXX7Rfh4lM1ywDgYLxQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=gDFgCrlUXwUtxQ7P/TEZExHRl5yqegLD4qx03WPBs Y0=; b=VuaUUb7xGr7NL/6F8mVI/NDBy+p5e8DRkWf32Izqk8kURqDL7/u7Rf9MY 4Z4CTpTjut25DRUzwt2riI/3Vvtfx5ToZ/kqJjSMGWLSHL+7gY90TseQua6a2qI5 QVMxAUA4GgYGl/bofjL+uX3YmKMonVaMXGdRemgQZ3xvRZEQ0+DdGUMhmxDorRJJ snsqInzrWORnJefjxOG/kuUcLGdTnnNBP9U/c9uwBH4RpILuNUdKLmaQUUwnIf+t DofbuJIsOQUeSLkZiiMMD3P/OtdNhEasJK/zLCLIaUh4IosnVM7j1hF8DDVONTbh pZp+0iuw2DblNmnzuVYGcQqCcUV6A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrudduiedgfedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 06:40:34 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: dev@dpdk.org, lijuan.tu@intel.com, juraj.linkes@pantheon.tech, ohilyard@iol.unh.edu, david.marchand@redhat.com, david.hunt@intel.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, nd@arm.com, reshma.pattan@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH] examples/distributor: one Tx queue is enough Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2022 12:40:33 +0100 Message-ID: <12861562.BaYr0rKQ5T@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20220307223946.578201-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org 08/03/2022 11:00, Bruce Richardson: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:39:46PM +0000, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote: > > Distributor application creates one Tx queue per core. However > > the transmit is done only from a single core. Hence creating > > one Tx queue is enough. > > > > Fixes: 07db4a975094 ("examples/distributor: new sample app") > > Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com > > Cc: reshma.pattan@intel.com > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang > > --- > > DTS test cases make this change to DPDK. However, I find that, one > > queue is enough. Hence we could make this change in DPDK. > > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson Applied, thanks.