From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC27A0C47;
	Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:57:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB1641143;
	Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:57:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.224]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8EC40151;
 Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:57:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCA1580E39;
 Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:57:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:57:46 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh=
 N4Od/dVurAJradb89uqMMOqOgPZdD97JVVGA+yZQiOw=; b=V693Au5CtVF443EY
 0bpfPp34ueS9oP6NHguuhG1VMtFu+YzwK/bvuTboglI5nR5y2j/feWf0BGZee9rn
 MlK8lY702Rcczq8mFmk3bojm9EcUno8oIHxzPcJuPHabnBNdtjJwuFbRt5yTZQer
 z+Jm0Ut4QjKeJ+PEXrs8TvfCpM34nBY4hxzcLGbJ0otJS1BWEgG/+hWONSdfy3pO
 qbjlxeF8i5uf5HNmJ1v/xUIr6JHh0RRF7LnaUt/2zYw3a7bC23K/spYvDuViLHRK
 RGkBaSjZEZNeVeOEw/sVc2KqgJdMOEyIfdKnaCiHNzR+XNzcgB76A99GxOCya0a8
 pecZyA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=N4Od/dVurAJradb89uqMMOqOgPZdD97JVVGA+yZQi
 Ow=; b=fCNr+dJc81UBJ9Y1fc9QTBq7XlaMTxSQj8i2xrFCP7s7geGH2GGtaH8Sl
 JV7AlLwTQSqAj9AdNZsmCoUQdstHn66tUJobHltGfHiQANELHjln5/usiy6FXLOa
 HCS/G49yWlM4RMWAYzTB33IT12lsgsuva+xfcaFz1ZFcpqVw8Qr1ys99xYw9xz6t
 b65KY2Zn4UsdxTsCLPH6Gs7u1KTYqaP1JG5FpXvBT1G5coIeWQCkD1cxL8tWXEDa
 ADDSvhdMIu8FiK85ZhtLfh9dvN47wLHHPHX+2NWHHf0ORWqmRzkdMUtivxkF5iVl
 Cw5qw96xZQVrsa9rKSThfy0ZKnQ0A==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:WpRlYfAnVk-LvLTMZWF0aN7QGM1gJZwKtEbWIOvWy6igCDz9oo6jJA>
 <xme:WpRlYVi9xmieP5A7fZ7qeDPp7VtBIkuFiv1LFxLay7Df6xrh_IHLJqC0bIWMn7Y6-
 IrwdAL4ZrbRj8fLiw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:WpRlYakGPP_nCVkbFZYpuJ2fVUXBrtCttVCeXawrWqE75fuFVKe4Cv70jdobNPg9pZtQtaOuAmhQIlBDrErs6hQ4loF1EUnL1FF4I5yu>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddtkedgieekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
 fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
 uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne
 cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr
 shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg
 ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu
 ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh
 homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:WpRlYRwYOpEEP6X5XVholm9AZj3gE9V0Op-dvW4AYLpMkLG3eniMjA>
 <xmx:WpRlYUQwecXkIZT2Xrs7J9gNdSX20bE4DjnP-8d-RmfBjjPDkgDTZg>
 <xmx:WpRlYUZBje0NcPH9OS3Dl_OoMxuGgNf74ypIPuKq4Zp4LpakJd9ANw>
 <xmx:WpRlYZJbXAVpxP8TLc10vjNxNK7RuVcqlf2Bc64tO9g1F-SDdfqVwg>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue,
 12 Oct 2021 09:57:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>, Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>,
 David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Thinh Tran <thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>,
 "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>, "Yang,
 Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>, "ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>,
 dpdklab <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>, "Singh, Aman Deep" <aman.deep.singh@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:57:40 +0200
Message-ID: <12868744.RCERaND3CH@thomas>
In-Reply-To: <2892d296-4690-ab6e-8c48-3e997644c2a6@intel.com>
References: <CAOE1vsOQTj+Gb9P8dShdZwSTs7xp5dHzvxD-oT8qck3j6gLK0A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOE1vsM2yU3prUZqx3N7aQnrBA34r3SJCaNdbWkSv3i7+-zbpA@mail.gmail.com>
 <2892d296-4690-ab6e-8c48-3e997644c2a6@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] RHEL7 failures
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

12/10/2021 15:32, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 10/12/2021 1:39 PM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote:
> > Ferruh and Thinh,
> > 
> > Yes, that will also work and should trigger the rebuild to the tip of the
> > current git repo / branch.  Apologizes for forgetting that behavior is
> > built into the runner.
> > 
> > All,
> > 
> > That raises the question, for the planned work to allow triggering rebuilds
> > / reruns through patchwork, what is the expected behavior, rerun exactly
> > what was run before, or move to the current pointer (assuming it's moved
> > on) and build/run on top of that?  What best aligns with everyone's
> > expectations, so we don't get confusion, etc.?
> > 
> 
> I don't see any problem to rerun the test with latest head of the repo,
> eventually patch on the patchwork needs to be merged on top of the latest
> head.
> Even the intention is only to test infrastructure etc with rerun,
> it shouldn't hurt to update the pointer too.

+1 to run on the latest HEAD