From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5E5A04B1; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:56:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C10BC910; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:56:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C78C90E for ; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 15:56:16 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1606229774; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YaopiaYqQjV0d9eyhiOe5i8PbLEGyN4NXOZHFkq17EA=; b=GA17kE3IYB39SYNRKGv2ZCVEtVL4nW7NVEMKJDd0IA4XY10a1N0aNGuyxItMNDanpbSgCQ gL09VIPYjzoopTJ01kupsLfByz1CPbx1PDq1lXjSaAnBS39/4C1BOoyYtlxjgp3o76G1Dl +lzNiaz4l7kq3boCOWHeQVyjZB94hBk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-313-Eb5sJBgAPLSupxJxUsZFiQ-1; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:56:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Eb5sJBgAPLSupxJxUsZFiQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B6AB190A7A1; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F918189A5; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail25.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail25.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.31]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59034180954D; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 14:56:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:56:07 -0500 (EST) From: Pei Zhang To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, ktraynor@redhat.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, tredaelli@redhat.com Message-ID: <1308146149.3879069.1606229767093.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <2457559.JHJOnYWPqN@thomas> References: <2457559.JHJOnYWPqN@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.68.5.41, 10.4.195.15] Thread-Topic: release candidate 20.11-rc5 Thread-Index: zdIdGr6Zz/Td3Wn8qtYOotTn3gDbZw== X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pezhang@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-announce] release candidate 20.11-rc5 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Thomas, The testing with dpdk 20.11-rc5 from Red Hat looks good. We tested below 16 scenarios and and all got PASS on RHEL8: (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS (2)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) : PASS (3)Guest with device assignment(VF) throughput testing: PASS (4)PVP (host dpdk testpmd as vswitch) 1Q: throughput testing: PASS (5)PVP vhost-user 2Q throughput testing: PASS (6)PVP vhost-user 1Q - cross numa node throughput testing: PASS (7)Guest with vhost-user 2 queues throughput testing: PASS (8)vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: qemu reconnect: PASS (9)PVP 1Q live migration testing: PASS (10)PVP 1Q cross numa node live migration testing: PASS (11)Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing: PASS (12)Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 1Q live migration testing (2M): PASS (13)Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 2Q live migration testing: PASS (14) Allocate memory from the NUMA node which Virtio device locates: PASS (15)Host PF + DPDK testing: PASS (16)Host VF + DPDK testing: PASS Versions: kernel 4.18 qemu 5.1 dpdk: git://dpdk.org/dpdk # git log -1 commit 61bd270c4adc7dff1f9c8af1f2c72618860d4395 (HEAD -> main, tag: v20.11-rc5, origin/releases, origin/main, origin/HEAD) Author: Thomas Monjalon Date: Sun Nov 22 22:53:47 2020 +0100 version: 20.11-rc5 Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon # git branch * main NICs: X540-AT2 NIC(ixgbe, 10G) Best regards, Pei ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Monjalon" To: announce@dpdk.org Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 6:07:25 AM Subject: [dpdk-announce] release candidate 20.11-rc5 A new DPDK release candidate is ready for testing: https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/tag/?id=v20.11-rc5 There are 90 new patches in this snapshot. Release notes: http://doc.dpdk.org/guides/rel_notes/release_20_11.html Please update the section "Tested Platforms". It should be the last release candidate for DPDK 20.11. After -rc5 there should be only doc updates. Please review pending patches related to the documentation: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?q=doc Please share some validation results by replying to this message (at dev@dpdk.org). If no critical issue, DPDK 20.11.0 will be closed in few days. If you are preparing the next release cycle, please send your v1 patches before December 20, and share your roadmap to get high priority. Planning is especially important to avoid maintainers being flooded. Thank you everyone