From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9D51B210 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 23:52:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0F020BC6; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:52:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:52:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=IEUWGj4RSGZbn6nCLiwz0mScYa fj6Y7kgi/qhZpaFsQ=; b=MPqwnORS24w3lWSrpL/oOOp747WSi5xtfmK8o7FzR1 b6+JO1ylVT8/ivtpFSvwrUt27CzXXXIwslCamJFZ1JJEeVgVcC7CjSw52OP69q1m dS85hkIvBhrLI/SvuoTz2mD951NS+CVpetI9iWAsOJd7cOJIV3gD+ki9ZlECmflh Q= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=IEUWGj 4RSGZbn6nCLiwz0mScYafj6Y7kgi/qhZpaFsQ=; b=N0NGxcCygTuColAMAX2Cf6 t5Ehr9Fhjhh+MOPWz/stSNOosvPIZVlLmj0C7+7UWUjkNlgfymBfn1dR+HbcIf9Z 0qewBSLb2rbgrb6K6IdKPr92oAxx6FwxFa8+CdIYpSoykPh0ApermelxgbpsKI3W DZ0gXrHxnPRBWY+EI9DWLd9cNivbA3X/kOD2s5voNAgJo/0oA9LKC3O/QI5u64F3 57270eX9EUq6MHAjvzcj2Px4/EbAmTKra5nlS03fEHNKRa9I4WHXDP98tupcyplW lRUM7nVFmNhwkbW7rPkG/rp+BlTq3nYLoBSE7Ibuc+BU9+v5EwLHBQsYEIxc69hw == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C90FB24009; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:52:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jonas Pfefferle Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Burakov, Anatoly" Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 23:52:20 +0200 Message-ID: <13135517.M83Xks1qV7@xps> In-Reply-To: <4a4cc895-0c87-da56-83e9-f5f5b1b623fa@intel.com> References: <1509031189-22601-1-git-send-email-jpf@zurich.ibm.com> <4a4cc895-0c87-da56-83e9-f5f5b1b623fa@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vfio: check ioctl return value X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 21:52:22 -0000 26/10/2017 17:23, Burakov, Anatoly: > On 26-Oct-17 4:19 PM, Jonas Pfefferle wrote: > > Check return value of device reset ioctl > > > > Fixes: 33604c31354a ("vfio: refactor PCI BAR mapping") > > Coverity issue: 195003 > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Pfefferle > > Looks fine to me, so > > Acked-by: Anatoly Burakov Applied, thanks