From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79300A0A02; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:44:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2641C4068E; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:44:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2A940041 for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 15:44:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7785C013C; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:44:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 18 May 2021 09:44:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= v69ZrEszGaA/yWW4EocF+Ko8j41fUD6p3i2W7UmxBS0=; b=iaanuAsFNERXIRJu ePtJ7ZWj33tqk1NxFbjbGYzJ9UEZZIAea6Xi4upH9QKGmKxDe42iEB4rjtTdgPn+ FWmYMDrZ14z44EorMT967V6tk9wVwxpz4gBRvsUEyxOp+XvI69eUMom5tLirUy6j GASzAoyMH+1sbQpxxS/JLDavqFiG0Ufo2GPxhdPwzAHFUH7fgk8nHgvJhg6Qp+6O CaG2/6VGqcu3ZyGNhmC4W7oRE0MN0Mlq7LdO+aqOu0S5wTfsSJVQTlrZg49J7BZL Oxy6zLxRX38OxHjBmYniw4fNhD+BIqWfEFnuPCZoiAOZjXTU/P3AVQ8sDVue4zPZ CstDHg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=v69ZrEszGaA/yWW4EocF+Ko8j41fUD6p3i2W7UmxB S0=; b=byML7klbyTTKT0kUJ3drdOiSHo9f6Y5pyWVUPjOhVwiJ/tFr1WbB6T4eC P/Sm+2WZZhx/YuNLDPbTHK0NeYmnjRlnbihvpch4JpFpeEqOJrsViWawBvybSeL2 cQFm3LPKcHojPIL/TjJ6eXQqT8vjNRIoZvBeWg+Dwo08V2mbsziPu1KznyC7u3J9 c/1IMrxdGWFZ4IvY8nUx9HZy/lUBXxF0gOUOg7oxjzYU7BFHQ1+HcXcP1igrFWqw IxXymKdorgTApkA9AIraNg7HCL43TXfQHcL5YgbM9b47qMXUhR0zNPNf5Cxt5UZY PS3TfkJzY/lbTgjkkVe+U0e+bq4YA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdeijedgieejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdvffejueetleefieeludduuefgteejleevfeekjeefieegheet ffdvkeefgedunecuffhomhgrihhnpeguphgukhdrohhrghenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrd dvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhf rhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 18 May 2021 09:44:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bing Zhao Cc: Ferruh Yigit , Ori Kam , Slava Ovsiienko , Matan Azrad , dev@dpdk.org, Raslan Darawsheh , "andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru" Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 15:44:00 +0200 Message-ID: <13627037.LXhn9qPFKt@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210518125235.90185-1-bingz@nvidia.com> <1224f1d8-c500-e442-dab6-1537c925173e@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: add new feature for connection tracking X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/05/2021 15:33, Bing Zhao: > From: Ferruh Yigit > > On 5/18/2021 1:52 PM, Bing Zhao wrote: > > > The feature support of connection tracking is added in the feature > > > table of networking drivers. The feature overview part is also > > > updated. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bing Zhao > > > > Hi Bing, > > > > Thomas is suggestion another table to list flow API item/actions in > > separate table, can this change can be replaced by it? > > It is OK for me. But I might need the comments from Thomas, Ori and ETHDEV maintainers since you all are much more familiar with the documents and their scopes. > > @Thomas, is it OK? Yes, I mark this patch as rejected. See how it is added in the new table: https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210518132844.3779728-3-thomas@monjalon.net/