DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
To: Dariusz Sosnowski <dsosnowski@nvidia.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] ethdev: rework config restore
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:31:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <13747524-f073-4749-adbd-be1c7681dbcd@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240918092201.33772-1-dsosnowski@nvidia.com>

On 9/18/2024 10:21 AM, Dariusz Sosnowski wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> We have been working on optimizing the latency of calls to rte_eth_dev_start(),
> on ports spawned by mlx5 PMD. Most of the work requires changes in the implementation of
> .dev_start() PMD callback, but I also wanted to start a discussion regarding
> configuration restore.
> 
> rte_eth_dev_start() does a few things on top of calling .dev_start() callback:
> 
> - Before calling it:
>     - eth_dev_mac_restore() - if device supports RTE_ETH_DEV_NOLIVE_MAC_ADDR;
> - After calling it:
>     - eth_dev_mac_restore() - if device does not support RTE_ETH_DEV_NOLIVE_MAC_ADDR;
>     - restore promiscuous config
>     - restore all multicast config
> 
> eth_dev_mac_restore() iterates over all known MAC addresses -
> stored in rte_eth_dev_data.mac_addrs array - and calls
> .mac_addr_set() and .mac_addr_add() callbacks to apply these MAC addresses.
> 
> Promiscuous config restore checks if promiscuous mode is enabled or not,
> and calls .promiscuous_enable() or .promiscuous_disable() callback.
> 
> All multicast config restore checks if all multicast mode is enabled or not,
> and calls .allmulticast_enable() or .allmulticast_disable() callback.
> 
> Callbacks are called directly in all of these cases, to bypass the checks
> for applying the same configuration, which exist in relevant APIs.
> Checks are bypassed to force drivers to reapply the configuration.
> 
> Let's consider what happens in the following sequence of API calls.
> 
> 1. rte_eth_dev_configure()
> 2. rte_eth_tx_queue_setup()
> 3. rte_eth_rx_queue_setup()
> 4. rte_eth_promiscuous_enable()
>     - Call dev->dev_ops->promiscuous_enable()
>     - Stores promiscuous state in dev->data->promiscuous
> 5. rte_eth_allmulticast_enable()
>     - Call dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable()
>     - Stores allmulticast state in dev->data->allmulticast
> 6. rte_eth_dev_start()
>     - Call dev->dev_ops->dev_start()
>     - Call dev->dev_ops->mac_addr_set() - apply default MAC address
>     - Call dev->dev_ops->promiscuous_enable()
>     - Call dev->dev_ops->allmulticast_enable()
> 
> Even though all configuration is available in dev->data after step 5,
> library forces reapplying this configuration in step 6.
> 
> In mlx5 PMD case all relevant callbacks require communication with the kernel driver,
> to configure the device (mlx5 PMD must create/destroy new kernel flow rules and/or
> change netdev config).
> 
> mlx5 PMD handles applying all configuration in .dev_start(), so the following forced callbacks
> force additional communication with the kernel. The same configuration is applied multiple times.
> 
> As an optimization, mlx5 PMD could check if a given configuration was applied,
> but this would duplicate the functionality of the library
> (for example rte_eth_promiscuous_enable() does not call the driver
> if dev->data->promiscuous is set).
> 
> Question: Since all of the configuration is available before .dev_start() callback is called,
> why ethdev library does not expect .dev_start() to take this configuration into account?
> In other words, why library has to reapply the configuration?
> 
> I could not find any particular reason why configuration restore exists
> as part of the process (it was in the initial DPDK commit).
> 

My assumption is .dev_stop() cause these values reset in some devices,
so .dev_start() restores them back.
@Bruce or @Konstantin may remember the history.

But I agree this is device specific behavior, and can be managed by what
device requires.


> The patches included in this RFC, propose a mechanism which would help with managing which drivers
> rely on forceful configuration restore.
> Drivers could advertise if forceful configuration restore is needed through
> `RTE_ETH_DEV_*_FORCE_RESTORE` device flag. If this flag is set, then the driver in question
> requires ethdev to forcefully restore configuration.
> 

OK to use flag for it, but not sure about using 'dev_info->dev_flags'
(RTE_ETH_DEV_*) for this, as this flag is shared with user and this is
all dpdk internal.

What about to have a dedicated flag for it? We can have a dedicated set
of flag values for restore.
Also perhaps we have go into details what needs to be restored after
'stop' and what needs to be restored after 'reset' and use similar
mechanism etc...

> This way, if we would conclude that it makes sense for .dev_start() to handle all
> starting configuration aspects, we could track which drivers still rely on configuration restore.
> 
> Dariusz Sosnowski (4):
>   ethdev: rework config restore
>   ethdev: omit promiscuous config restore if not required
>   ethdev: omit all multicast config restore if not required
>   ethdev: omit MAC address restore if not required
> 
>  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> --
> 2.39.5
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-29 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-18  9:21 Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-09-18  9:21 ` [RFC 1/4] " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-09-18  9:21 ` [RFC 2/4] ethdev: omit promiscuous config restore if not required Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-09-18  9:22 ` [RFC 3/4] ethdev: omit all multicast " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-09-18  9:22 ` [RFC 4/4] ethdev: omit MAC address " Dariusz Sosnowski
2024-09-29 23:31 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=13747524-f073-4749-adbd-be1c7681dbcd@amd.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dsosnowski@nvidia.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).