From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (mail-wg0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3D65911 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 2014 02:46:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id y10so1001032wgg.24 for ; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:46:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id; bh=QI0CnweGGq4KnEpufpTV54iSJtJ5DKCLJG4Mn+YtcxA=; b=YaevtrmwCIM96oFCsJ38eITswwcbAO05FcMMrVaDjaL6iueAgcPpufGiAcdXunXu6M X888q0BEooTJpRdMSwZgUr+LR46x6Y/5D+Ih/99Mi2d/WEvepdFJ7xw4I9q/yC0hHcz4 MS+571Wj0Y7zVu5SD40tGSeA1sCqMy+3/AzbW2ixVlcbNgplLpPIryfcOuYmVsX6VgmK SVFKUZXboK6Yshgu7otFH0UJYjPds5MGrenrwgzDRSmbgZs7hUnIWXZ4my9PEfu07m95 SW++eBmDlVgV3KmzHjNbKxzjSuazGKhVgtFKXjdGZ8vU2WJlwG63BknqfUGU4Bl3AJec 0tUw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkUrJ4dLD6I6Ec3GooTsekzaIod6NaEf6N2MhPGY4T8zPTpBmkSrJltSJ5gx9jiL6yS86SR X-Received: by 10.180.72.179 with SMTP id e19mr747384wiv.61.1398818813297; Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (abo-213-55-68.mts.modulonet.fr. [85.68.55.213]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hm5sm33521685wjc.17.2014.04.29.17.46.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:46:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 02:46:41 +0200 Message-Id: <1398818805-18834-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.2 Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] recipes for RPM packages X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:46:50 -0000 The goal of this patch serie is to be able to package DPDK for RPM-based distributions. The file naming currently doesn't allow to install different DPDK versions. But the packaging naming should be ready to manage different DPDK versions having different API/ABI for different applications: - dpdk-core has full version in its name to manage API breaking - extensions have a number as name suffix to manage PMD API breaking. When API/ABI will be stable, package names could be simpler. I suggest to add these .spec files as a starting point for integration in Linux distributions. Changes since v1: - name of .spec file match package name - version in package name - no static library - ldconfig/depmod in scriplets Thanks for your comments/reviews. -- Thomas