From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C179AA00E6
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Tue,  9 Jul 2019 17:51:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC7B324D;
	Tue,  9 Jul 2019 17:50:59 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E689CA3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  9 Jul 2019 17:50:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
 [10.5.11.15])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FEF730872FD;
 Tue,  9 Jul 2019 15:50:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.18.25.137])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8B18705E;
 Tue,  9 Jul 2019 15:50:50 +0000 (UTC)
From: Michael Santana Francisco <msantana@redhat.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, 
 dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
 JananeeX M Parthasarathy <jananeex.m.parthasarathy@intel.com>,
 david.hunt@intel.com
References: <1559638792-8608-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>
 <1560580950-16754-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com>
 <70986373.KVGszKu7e3@xps> <f7tk1d1rbay.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com>
 <CAJFAV8zYBgMoA7fBgDOM4ECiRkBsf6U+NPMWW=f+zNBmjFPUQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABzctQ8T9GpGkoeBn+snqaDfb369gWjnHEAO_6YWS7e+VuDsxw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat
Message-ID: <139fd420-dbee-0a33-1885-00c9593fe201@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:50:49 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABzctQ8T9GpGkoeBn+snqaDfb369gWjnHEAO_6YWS7e+VuDsxw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.47]); Tue, 09 Jul 2019 15:50:57 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/15] Unit tests fixes for CI
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 7/1/19 2:07 PM, Michael Santana Francisco wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 6:04 PM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> - rwlock_autotest and hash_readwrite_lf_autotest are taking a little more
>>>>>    than 10s,
>>> Occasionally the distributor test times out as well.  I've moved them as
>>> part of a separate patch, that I'll post along with a bigger series to
>>> enable the unit tests under travis.  Michael and I are leaning toward
>>> introducing a new variable called RUN_TESTS which will do the docs and
>>> unit testing since those combined would add quite a bit to the execution
>>> time of each job (and feel free to bike shed the name, since the patches
>>> aren't final).
>>
>> Seeing how the distributor autotest usually takes less than a second to complete, this sounds like a bug.
>> I don't think I caught this so far.
> So I actually ran into the distributor test timing out. I agree with
> David in that it is a bug with the test. Looking at the logs that test
> normally finishes in less than 1/2 a second, so running to 10 seconds
> and timing out is a big jump in run time. I ran into the issue where
> it timedout, so I restarted the job and it finished no problem.
> The test fails every so often for no good reason and the logs[1] dont
> really say much. I speculate that it is waiting for a resource to
> become available or in the worse case a deadlock. Seeing that it only
> fails every so often and it passes when restarted I don't think it's a
> big deal, nevertheless it's worth investing time figuring out what's
> wrong
>
> [1] https://api.travis-ci.com/v3/job/212335916/log.txt

I investigated a little bit on this this test. CC'd David Hunt,

I was able to reproduce the problem on v19.08-rc1 with:

`while sudo sh -c "echo 'distributor_autotest' | 
./build/app/test/dpdk-test"; do :; done`

It runs a couple of times fine showing output and showing progress, but 
then at some point after a couple of seconds it just stops - no longer 
getting any output. It just sits there with no further output. I let it 
sit there for a whole minute and nothing happens. So I attach gdb to try 
to figure out what is happening. One thread seems to be stuck on a while 
loop, see lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c:310.

I looked at the assembly code (layout asm, ni) and I saw these four 
lines below (which correspond to the while loop) being executed 
repeatedly and indefinitely. It looks like this thread is waiting for 
the variable bufptr64[0] to change state.

0xa064d0 <release+32>   pause
0xa064d2 <release+34>   mov    0x3840(%rdx),%rax
0xa064d9 <release+41>   test   $0x1,%al
0xa064db <release+43>   je     0xa064d0 <release+32>


While the first thread is waiting on bufptr64[0] to change state, there 
is another thread that is also stuck on another while loop on 
lib/librte_distributor/rte_distributor.c:53. It seems that this thread 
is stuck waiting for retptr64 to change state. Corresponding assembly 
being executed indefinitely:

0xa06de0 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+592> mov    0x38c0(%r8),%rax
0xa06de7 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+599> test   $0x1,%al
0xa06de9 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+601> je     0xa06bbd 
<rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+45>
0xa06def <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+607>        nop
0xa06df0 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+608> pause
0xa06df2 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+610> rdtsc
0xa06df4 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+612> mov    %rdx,%r10
0xa06df7 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+615> shl    $0x20,%r10
0xa06dfb <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+619> mov    %eax,%eax
0xa06dfd <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+621> or     %r10,%rax
0xa06e00 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+624> lea    0x64(%rax),%r10
0xa06e04 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+628> jmp    0xa06e12 
<rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+642>
0xa06e06 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+630> nopw   %cs:0x0(%rax,%rax,1)
0xa06e10 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+640> pause
0xa06e12 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+642> rdtsc
0xa06e14 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+644> shl    $0x20,%rdx
0xa06e18 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+648> mov    %eax,%eax
0xa06e1a <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+650> or     %rdx,%rax
0xa06e1d <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+653> cmp    %rax,%r10
0xa06e20 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+656> ja     0xa06e10 
<rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+640>
0xa06e22 <rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+658> jmp    0xa06de0 
<rte_distributor_request_pkt_v1705+592>


My guess is that these threads are interdependent, so one thread is 
waiting for the other thread to change the state of the control 
variable. I can't say for sure if this is what is happening or why the 
these variables don't change state, so I would like ask someone who is 
more familiar with this particular code to take a look

>>
>> Yes, we need a variable to control this and select the targets that will do the tests and/or build the doc.
>> About the name, RUN_TESTS is ok for me.
>>
>> What do you want to make of this variable?
>> Have it as a simple boolean that enables everything? Or a selector with strings like unit-tests+doc+perf-tests?
>>
>>
>>>>> - librte_table unit test crashes on ipv6 [2],
>>> I guess we're waiting on a patch from Jananee (CC'd)?
>>
>> Yep.
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Marchand