From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44134231C for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 17:52:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 May 2014 08:47:03 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,868,1392192000"; d="scan'208";a="514129825" Received: from irvmail001.ir.intel.com ([163.33.26.43]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 19 May 2014 08:52:07 -0700 Received: from sivswdev02.ir.intel.com (sivswdev02.ir.intel.com [10.237.217.46]) by irvmail001.ir.intel.com (8.14.3/8.13.6/MailSET/Hub) with ESMTP id s4JFq6XY003659; Mon, 19 May 2014 16:52:06 +0100 Received: from sivswdev02.ir.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sivswdev02.ir.intel.com with ESMTP id s4JFq6ui025107; Mon, 19 May 2014 16:52:06 +0100 Received: (from aburakov@localhost) by sivswdev02.ir.intel.com with id s4JFq6ur025101; Mon, 19 May 2014 16:52:06 +0100 From: Anatoly Burakov To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 16:51:45 +0100 Message-Id: <1400514709-24087-13-git-send-email-anatoly.burakov@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.0.7 In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 12/16] Adding unit tests for VFIO EAL command-line parameter X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 15:52:01 -0000 Adding unit tests for VFIO interrupt type command-line parameter. We don't know if VFIO is compiled (eal_vfio.h header is internal to Linuxapp EAL), so we check this flag regardless. Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov --- app/test/test_eal_flags.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c index 195a1f5..081b47f 100644 --- a/app/test/test_eal_flags.c +++ b/app/test/test_eal_flags.c @@ -768,6 +768,18 @@ test_misc_flags(void) const char *argv11[] = {prgname, "--file-prefix=virtaddr", "-c", "1", "-n", "2", "--base-virtaddr=0x12345678"}; + /* try running with --vfio-intr INTx flag */ + const char *argv12[] = {prgname, "--file-prefix=intr", + "-c", "1", "-n", "2", "--vfio-intr=legacy"}; + + /* try running with --vfio-intr MSI-X flag */ + const char *argv13[] = {prgname, "--file-prefix=intr", + "-c", "1", "-n", "2", "--vfio-intr=msix"}; + + /* try running with --vfio-intr invalid flag */ + const char *argv14[] = {prgname, "--file-prefix=intr", + "-c", "1", "-n", "2", "--vfio-intr=invalid"}; + if (launch_proc(argv0) == 0) { printf("Error - process ran ok with invalid flag\n"); @@ -820,6 +832,18 @@ test_misc_flags(void) printf("Error - process did not run ok with --base-virtaddr parameter\n"); return -1; } + if (launch_proc(argv12) != 0) { + printf("Error - process did not run ok with --vfio-intr INTx parameter\n"); + return -1; + } + if (launch_proc(argv13) != 0) { + printf("Error - process did not run ok with --vfio-intr MSI-X parameter\n"); + return -1; + } + if (launch_proc(argv14) == 0) { + printf("Error - process run ok with --vfio-intr invalid parameter\n"); + return -1; + } return 0; } #endif -- 1.7.0.7