From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com (mail-pa0-f52.google.com [209.85.220.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FB6DE0 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 23:14:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pa0-f52.google.com with SMTP id iv1so28059989pac.2 for ; Wed, 04 May 2016 14:14:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=versa-networks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:subject:date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=sYoX8tPvPHtB4qlYNcl+cLPEcsqePoIzA867VpwE/B0=; b=rVg4qGAht4jXeobzKMCnb9b6J2ZKnxFIZuOTD96F/rdKdusisAcgQSGmfBnVtHgwMd gJv31qIEwQSUIH//DT484IVwat3hU+NNTHGBCIDKA1EVPlmXFuUSWr7J5WmMjjnN+hYq 2kp4R39y9uJRyuMylWrS7hg44pOnZna5a+ilqoWKYBVpelBOw0/yq+SD8jkBemO60WrV S3AsdyYUbDUzM4hliSqq3so4sPnhdJhAYAGvDc6Spwr1dW5t0BQss5xAag5hpeiqJ7e7 sK3Njvp01dAq8x9pN3c22pywkhZM5D/kN42qbVNohGCpTDhEFgzP/vIsdz6Mmpm7Za8w 6pDg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:date:message-id:cc:to:mime-version; bh=sYoX8tPvPHtB4qlYNcl+cLPEcsqePoIzA867VpwE/B0=; b=hhyt/GkAQ+Sv5HBFFKqrXysg4LmnlQeRoIAwjXm3jcyOL2kdBjD0ijfNIWyJuI1NSJ 6Of/VG9dTxKzH5P7Aq3w7MLHpVT2i0wRUMRIxGJOHje98PkEluwa7RiXXyabA1wXklqn vcbMoYiqF2umSmO+iBtMPZJSD5bY5CK6NZKesTPu/jtlMSY7VV15JncCqC7cLkShACz+ 0J2aq8oVHEOkXuItAFV+ChzgEJsd2HmpHKh7DWdR53XTmLxQ3bQVhi32Wfwry9tbXV0i UdSKQi7gYeuzn3MQumjoBuIKGT9TELxDGLodGTLJ8AjIaL95GU96Jic+YVAzv/7gbzho ktnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FV7R00sO3gnfRNW7LglPfl6hlM6hNJFBxpDqsWTSgMiKMJzifqh+jL6/3K+I7jBmL1E X-Received: by 10.66.1.135 with SMTP id 7mr15215316pam.106.1462396486594; Wed, 04 May 2016 14:14:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.48] (70-35-56-62.static.wiline.com. [70.35.56.62]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l88sm8200616pfb.79.2016.05.04.14.14.44 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 May 2016 14:14:46 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sridhar.V.Iyer" Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 14:14:42 -0700 Message-Id: <140ABA5F-E537-409E-8614-D3B986C6121C@versa-networks.com> Cc: Ananda To: dev@dpdk.org, "Dumitrescu, Cristian" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Old oversubscription related checkin X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 21:14:47 -0000 Hi Cristian, I stumbled into an old from 2013 = (http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/patch/lib/librte_sched/rte_sched.c?id=3D835c5= 409a7bac3055b82bebee65d8ada7f20d332 = ) I couldn=E2=80=99t find any context for the patch from the mail = archives. Could you please let me know why oversubscription was removed = from all the other traffic classes and just given to tc3? Were there huge performance penalties? Would there be any issues if I = add this patch back again locally (enable/disabled via config). Regards, Sridhar V Iyer