From: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] fix of enabling all newly added error flags
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2014 09:46:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1417743988-15604-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1416982032-28519-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com>
Before redefining mbuf structure, there was lack of free bits in 'ol_flags'
(32 bits in total) for new RX or TX flags. So it tried to reuse existant bits
as most as possible, or even assigning 0 to some of bit flags. After new mbuf
structure defined, there are quite a lot of free bits. So those newly added
bit flags should be assigned with correct and valid bit values, and getting
their names should be enabled as well. Note that 'RECIP' should be removed,
as nowhere will use it.
v2 changes:
* Removed error flag of 'ECIPE' processing only in both i40e PMD and mbuf. All
other error flags were added back.
* Assigned error flags with correct and valid values, as their previous values
were invalid.
* Enabled getting all error flag names.
Helin Zhang (2):
i40e: remove checking rxd flag which is not public
mbuf: assign valid bit values for some RX and TX flags
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.c | 9 ++++-----
lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 19 +++++++++----------
lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_rxtx.c | 6 ------
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-05 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-26 6:07 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] i40e: Use one bit flag for all hardware detected RX packet errors Helin Zhang
2014-11-26 10:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-26 11:22 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-26 13:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-11-26 14:12 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-11-28 8:07 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-11-28 8:47 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-01 1:57 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-01 9:58 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-02 7:25 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-05 1:46 ` Helin Zhang [this message]
2014-12-05 1:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] i40e: remove checking rxd flag which is not public Helin Zhang
2014-12-05 1:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] mbuf: assign valid bit values for some RX and TX flags Helin Zhang
2014-12-05 10:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-06 0:42 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-06 1:07 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-08 10:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-09 2:29 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-06 1:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] mbuf: fix of enabling all newly added RX error flags Helin Zhang
2014-12-08 10:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2014-12-09 2:23 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-08 10:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-09 2:14 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-09 6:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-10 8:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Helin Zhang
2014-12-10 9:35 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-10 13:50 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-10 15:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-10 22:29 ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-11 11:16 ` Olivier MATZ
2014-12-12 1:27 ` Zhang, Helin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1417743988-15604-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com \
--to=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).