DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: aaron.f.rowden@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] i40e: workaround for X710 performance issues
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 16:23:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1418718200-31924-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418630187-28917-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com>

On X710, performance number is far from the expectation on recent
firmware versions. The fix for this issue may not be integrated in
the following firmware version. So the workaround in software driver
is needed. It needs to modify the initial values of 3 internal only
registers. Note that the workaround can be removed when it is fixed
in firmware in the future.

Signed-off-by: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+)

v2 changes:
* Added a compile error fix.

v3 changes:
* Used PRIx32 and PRIx64 instead for printing uint32_t and uint64_t
  variables.
* Re-worded annotations, and commit logs.

diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
index 008d62c..624f0ce 100644
--- a/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c
@@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ static int i40e_dev_filter_ctrl(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
 				enum rte_filter_type filter_type,
 				enum rte_filter_op filter_op,
 				void *arg);
+static void i40e_configure_registers(struct i40e_hw *hw);
 
 /* Default hash key buffer for RSS */
 static uint32_t rss_key_default[I40E_PFQF_HKEY_MAX_INDEX + 1];
@@ -443,6 +444,16 @@ eth_i40e_dev_init(__rte_unused struct eth_driver *eth_drv,
 	/* Clear PXE mode */
 	i40e_clear_pxe_mode(hw);
 
+	/*
+	 * On X710, performance number is far from the expectation on recent
+	 * firmware versions. The fix for this issue may not be integrated in
+	 * the following firmware version. So the workaround in software driver
+	 * is needed. It needs to modify the initial values of 3 internal only
+	 * registers. Note that the workaround can be removed when it is fixed
+	 * in firmware in the future.
+	 */
+	i40e_configure_registers(hw);
+
 	/* Get hw capabilities */
 	ret = i40e_get_cap(hw);
 	if (ret != I40E_SUCCESS) {
@@ -5294,3 +5305,81 @@ i40e_pctype_to_flowtype(enum i40e_filter_pctype pctype)
 
 	return flowtype_table[pctype];
 }
+
+static int
+i40e_debug_read_register(struct i40e_hw *hw, uint32_t addr, uint64_t *val)
+{
+	struct i40e_aq_desc desc;
+	struct i40e_aqc_debug_reg_read_write *cmd =
+		(struct i40e_aqc_debug_reg_read_write *)&desc.params.raw;
+	enum i40e_status_code status;
+
+	i40e_fill_default_direct_cmd_desc(&desc, i40e_aqc_opc_debug_read_reg);
+	cmd->address = rte_cpu_to_le_32(addr);
+	status = i40e_asq_send_command(hw, &desc, NULL, 0, NULL);
+	if (status < 0)
+		return status;
+
+	*val = ((uint64_t)(rte_le_to_cpu_32(cmd->value_high)) << (CHAR_BIT *
+			sizeof(uint32_t))) + rte_le_to_cpu_32(cmd->value_low);
+
+	return status;
+}
+
+/*
+ * On X710, performance number is far from the expectation on recent firmware
+ * versions. The fix for this issue may not be integrated in the following
+ * firmware version. So the workaround in software driver is needed. It needs
+ * to modify the initial values of 3 internal only registers. Note that the
+ * workaround can be removed when it is fixed in firmware in the future.
+ */
+static void
+i40e_configure_registers(struct i40e_hw *hw)
+{
+#define I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_0       0x26CE00
+#define I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_2       0x26CE08
+#define I40E_GL_SWR_PM_UP_THR            0x269FBC
+#define I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_0_VALUE 0x10000200
+#define I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_2_VALUE 0x011f0200
+#define I40E_GL_SWR_PM_UP_THR_VALUE      0x03030303
+
+	static const struct {
+		uint32_t addr;
+		uint64_t val;
+	} reg_table[] = {
+		{I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_0, I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_0_VALUE},
+		{I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_2, I40E_GL_SWR_PRI_JOIN_MAP_2_VALUE},
+		{I40E_GL_SWR_PM_UP_THR, I40E_GL_SWR_PM_UP_THR_VALUE},
+	};
+	uint64_t reg;
+	uint32_t i;
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Below fix is for X710 only */
+	if (i40e_is_40G_device(hw->device_id))
+		return;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(reg_table); i++) {
+		ret = i40e_debug_read_register(hw, reg_table[i].addr, &reg);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to read from 0x%"PRIx32,
+							reg_table[i].addr);
+			break;
+		}
+		PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Read from 0x%"PRIx32": 0x%"PRIx64,
+						reg_table[i].addr, reg);
+		if (reg == reg_table[i].val)
+			continue;
+
+		ret = i40e_aq_debug_write_register(hw, reg_table[i].addr,
+						reg_table[i].val, NULL);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			PMD_DRV_LOG(ERR, "Failed to write 0x%"PRIx64" to the "
+				"address of 0x%"PRIx32, reg_table[i].val,
+							reg_table[i].addr);
+			break;
+		}
+		PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "Write 0x%"PRIx64" to the address of "
+			"0x%"PRIx32, reg_table[i].val, reg_table[i].addr);
+	}
+}
-- 
1.8.1.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-12-16  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-15  7:09 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Helin Zhang
2014-12-15  7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Helin Zhang
2014-12-16  2:29   ` Chen, Jing D
2014-12-16  2:43     ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-16  8:23   ` Helin Zhang [this message]
2014-12-16  8:37     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Thomas Monjalon
2014-12-16 11:07       ` Zhang, Helin
2014-12-16  9:07     ` Chen, Jing D
2014-12-17  0:05       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-08  2:43     ` Wu, Jingjing
2015-01-08  2:49       ` Zhang, Helin
2015-01-09  5:29     ` Wu, Jingjing
2015-01-09 15:48       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-01-12  0:26         ` Zhang, Helin
2015-01-12  0:39         ` Wu, Jingjing

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1418718200-31924-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --to=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=aaron.f.rowden@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).