DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] issue with ixgbevf speed/duplex introduced with commit 8ef32003772a14c61c70b540e41c259c482c2fb6
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 18:36:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1423715.Xz4LrI6SsO@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4465623.YhbiPPYfmU@xps13>

Ping?
There is still no review of this patch:
	http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/1079/
And there is another patch for the same issue:
	http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/1224/


2014-11-07 17:46, Thomas Monjalon:
> Hi,
> 
> Thank you for reporting and explaining the issue.
> 
> You have already sent a bug report and a patch for this issue.
> Are you sending this email to ask a review and integration of your patch?
> I think it should be reviewed by an Intel developer.
> 
> Note: it would be good to have the commit reference in the commit log
> of your patch.
> 
> PS: in such case, it's better to reply to the previous emails
> 
> Thanks
> > I'm seeing an issue with ixgbevf speed/duplex reporting that appears to have been introduced with
> > commit 8ef32003772a14c61c70b540e41c259c482c2fb6 (http://www.dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe/ixgbe_vf.c?id=8ef32003772a14c61c70b540e41c259c482c2fb6)
> > 
> > The issue I'm seeing seems to involve the following code.  If I'm reading this correctly,
> > one sets "mac->get_link_status = true" if the port is not OK, where "true" means that one
> > still needs to get the link status.  Due to the added test "if (!mac->get_link_status)",
> > one branches to the early exit if mac->get_link_status is false---meaning we have already
> > obtained the link status---instead of continuing with the analysis in the function body.
> > 
> > -       if (!(hw->mbx.ops.check_for_rst(hw, 0))) {
> > -               *link_up = false;
> > -               *speed = 0;
> > -               return -1;
> > -       }
> > +       /* If we were hit with a reset drop the link */
> > +       if (!mbx->ops.check_for_rst(hw, 0) || !mbx->timeout)
> > +               mac->get_link_status = true;
> > 
> > -       links_reg = IXGBE_VFREAD_REG(hw, IXGBE_VFLINKS);
> > +       if (!mac->get_link_status)
> > +               goto out;
> > 
> > When I run "testpmd" on ixgbevf ports either in the host OS or passed
> > through to a virtual machine, "testpmd" reports that the ixgbevf ports
> > have "speed 100 Mbps - half-duplex".  With the previous code (or with
> > my patch), "testpmd" reports "speed 10000 Mbps - full-duplex".
> 


-- 
Thomas

      reply	other threads:[~2014-11-27 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-07 16:36 Roberts, Lee A.
2014-11-07 16:46 ` Thomas Monjalon
2014-11-27 17:36   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1423715.Xz4LrI6SsO@xps13 \
    --to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).