From: Hemant Agrawal <Hemant@freescale.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni:optimization of rte_kni_rx_burst
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:18:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14248648813214-git-send-email-Hemant@freescale.com> (raw)
From: Hemant Agrawal <hemant@freescale.com>
if any buffer is read from the tx_q, MAX_BURST buffers will be allocated and attempted to be added to to the alloc_q.
This seems terribly inefficient and it also looks like the alloc_q will quickly fill to its maximum capacity. If the system buffers are low in number, it will reach "out of memory" situation.
This patch allocates the number of buffers as many dequeued from tx_q.
Signed-off-by: Hemant Agrawal <hemant@freescale.com>
---
lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
index 4e70fa0..4cf8e30 100644
--- a/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
+++ b/lib/librte_kni/rte_kni.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ struct rte_kni_memzone_pool {
static void kni_free_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni);
-static void kni_allocate_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni);
+static void kni_allocate_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni, int num);
static volatile int kni_fd = -1;
static struct rte_kni_memzone_pool kni_memzone_pool = {
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ rte_kni_rx_burst(struct rte_kni *kni, struct rte_mbuf **mbufs, unsigned num)
/* If buffers removed, allocate mbufs and then put them into alloc_q */
if (ret)
- kni_allocate_mbufs(kni);
+ kni_allocate_mbufs(kni, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ kni_free_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni)
}
static void
-kni_allocate_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni)
+kni_allocate_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni, int num)
{
int i, ret;
struct rte_mbuf *pkts[MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM];
@@ -620,7 +620,10 @@ kni_allocate_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni)
return;
}
- for (i = 0; i < MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM; i++) {
+ if (num == 0 || num > MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM)
+ num = MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
pkts[i] = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(kni->pktmbuf_pool);
if (unlikely(pkts[i] == NULL)) {
/* Out of memory */
@@ -636,7 +639,7 @@ kni_allocate_mbufs(struct rte_kni *kni)
ret = kni_fifo_put(kni->alloc_q, (void **)pkts, i);
/* Check if any mbufs not put into alloc_q, and then free them */
- if (ret >= 0 && ret < i && ret < MAX_MBUF_BURST_NUM) {
+ if (ret >= 0 && ret < i && ret < num) {
int j;
for (j = ret; j < i; j++)
--
1.9.1
next reply other threads:[~2015-02-25 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-25 11:48 Hemant Agrawal [this message]
2015-02-25 12:13 ` Olivier Deme
2015-02-25 12:24 ` Hemant
2015-02-25 12:28 ` Olivier Deme
2015-02-25 12:38 ` Marc Sune
2015-02-25 12:51 ` Olivier Deme
2015-02-25 13:29 ` Jay Rolette
2015-02-26 7:00 ` Hemant
2015-02-26 12:56 ` Marc Sune
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14248648813214-git-send-email-Hemant@freescale.com \
--to=hemant@freescale.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).