DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix reorder library unit test
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:50:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1445424644-9910-2-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445424644-9910-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com>

The reorder library unit test was performed under the assumption that the start
sequence number was always 0.
This is not the case anymore as the start sequence number is initialized by the first
packet inserted into the reorder buffer.

This patch updates the unit test to reflect the new behavior.

Fixes: 7e1fa1de8a53 ("reorder: allow random number as starting point")

Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan<reshma.pattan@intel.com>

---
Version 2:
split patch for unit test only
update commit message

 app/test/test_reorder.c |   75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_reorder.c b/app/test/test_reorder.c
index 5752d7e..67f3151 100644
--- a/app/test/test_reorder.c
+++ b/app/test/test_reorder.c
@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ test_reorder_create(void)
 			"No error on create() with invalid buffer size param.");
 
 	b = rte_reorder_create("PKT_RO1", rte_socket_id(), REORDER_BUFFER_SIZE);
-	printf("DEBUG: b= %p, orig_b= %p\n", b, test_params->b);
 	TEST_ASSERT_EQUAL(b, test_params->b,
 			"New reorder instance created with already existing name");
 
@@ -165,7 +164,7 @@ test_reorder_insert(void)
 	struct rte_reorder_buffer *b = NULL;
 	struct rte_mempool *p = test_params->p;
 	const unsigned int size = 4;
-	const unsigned int num_bufs = 6;
+	const unsigned int num_bufs = 7;
 	struct rte_mbuf *bufs[num_bufs];
 	int ret = 0;
 	unsigned i;
@@ -181,16 +180,6 @@ test_reorder_insert(void)
 	ret = rte_mempool_get_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, num_bufs);
 	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Error getting mbuf from pool");
 
-	/* late packet */
-	bufs[0]->seqn = 3 * size;
-	ret = rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[0]);
-	if (!((ret == -1) && (rte_errno == ERANGE))) {
-		printf("%s:%d: No error inserting late packet with seqn:"
-				" 3 * size\n", __func__, __LINE__);
-		ret = -1;
-		goto exit;
-	}
-
 	for (i = 0; i < num_bufs; i++)
 		bufs[i]->seqn = i;
 
@@ -232,6 +221,16 @@ test_reorder_insert(void)
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
+	/* late packet */
+	bufs[6]->seqn = 3 * size;
+	ret = rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[6]);
+	if (!((ret == -1) && (rte_errno == ERANGE))) {
+		printf("%s:%d: No error inserting late packet with seqn:"
+				" 3 * size\n", __func__, __LINE__);
+		ret = -1;
+		goto exit;
+	}
+
 	ret = 0;
 exit:
 	rte_mempool_put_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, num_bufs);
@@ -245,8 +244,9 @@ test_reorder_drain(void)
 	struct rte_reorder_buffer *b = NULL;
 	struct rte_mempool *p = test_params->p;
 	const unsigned int size = 4;
-	const unsigned int num_bufs = 10;
+	const unsigned int num_bufs = 8;
 	struct rte_mbuf *bufs[num_bufs];
+	struct rte_mbuf *robufs[num_bufs];
 	int ret = 0;
 	unsigned i, cnt;
 
@@ -255,14 +255,14 @@ test_reorder_drain(void)
 	 * ready_buf: RB[size] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
 	 * order_buf: OB[size] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
 	 */
-	b = rte_reorder_create("test_insert", rte_socket_id(), size);
+	b = rte_reorder_create("test_drain", rte_socket_id(), size);
 	TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(b, "Failed to create reorder buffer");
 
 	ret = rte_mempool_get_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, num_bufs);
 	TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(ret, "Error getting mbuf from pool");
 
 	/* Check no drained packets if reorder is empty */
-	cnt = rte_reorder_drain(b, bufs, 1);
+	cnt = rte_reorder_drain(b, robufs, 1);
 	if (cnt != 0) {
 		printf("%s:%d: drained packets from empty reorder buffer\n",
 				__func__, __LINE__);
@@ -276,29 +276,40 @@ test_reorder_drain(void)
 	/* Insert packet with seqn 1:
 	 * reorder_seq = 0
 	 * RB[] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
-	 * OB[] = {NULL, 1, NULL, NULL}
+	 * OB[] = {1, NULL, NULL, NULL}
 	 */
 	rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[1]);
 
-	/* Check no drained packets if no ready/order packets */
-	cnt = rte_reorder_drain(b, bufs, 1);
-	if (cnt != 0) {
-		printf("%s:%d: drained packets from empty reorder buffer\n",
-				__func__, __LINE__);
+	cnt = rte_reorder_drain(b, robufs, 1);
+	if (cnt != 1) {
+		printf("%s:%d:%d: number of expected packets not drained\n",
+				__func__, __LINE__, cnt);
 		ret = -1;
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
 	/* Insert more packets
 	 * RB[] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
-	 * OB[] = {0, 1, NULL, 3}
+	 * OB[] = {NULL, 2, 3, NULL}
 	 */
-	rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[0]);
+	rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[2]);
 	rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[3]);
 
+	/* Insert more packets
+	 * RB[] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
+	 * OB[] = {NULL, 2, 3, 4}
+	 */
+	rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[4]);
+
+	/* Insert more packets
+	 * RB[] = {2, 3, 4, NULL}
+	 * OB[] = {NULL, NULL, 7, NULL}
+	 */
+	rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[7]);
+
 	/* drained expected packets */
-	cnt = rte_reorder_drain(b, bufs, 4);
-	if (cnt != 2) {
+	cnt = rte_reorder_drain(b, robufs, 4);
+	if (cnt != 3) {
 		printf("%s:%d:%d: number of expected packets not drained\n",
 				__func__, __LINE__, cnt);
 		ret = -1;
@@ -307,25 +318,15 @@ test_reorder_drain(void)
 
 	/*
 	 * RB[] = {NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL}
-	 * OB[] = {NULL, 3, NULL, NULL}
-	 */
-
-	rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[4]);
-	rte_reorder_insert(b, bufs[7]);
-
-	/*
-	 * RB[] = {3, 4, NULL, NULL}
 	 * OB[] = {NULL, NULL, 7, NULL}
 	 */
-
-	cnt = rte_reorder_drain(b, bufs, 4);
-	if (cnt != 2) {
+	cnt = rte_reorder_drain(b, robufs, 1);
+	if (cnt != 0) {
 		printf("%s:%d:%d: number of expected packets not drained\n",
 				__func__, __LINE__, cnt);
 		ret = -1;
 		goto exit;
 	}
-
 	ret = 0;
 exit:
 	rte_mempool_put_bulk(p, (void *)bufs, num_bufs);
-- 
1.7.4.1

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-21 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-21 10:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update maintainer for reorder library Reshma Pattan
2015-10-21 10:50 ` Reshma Pattan [this message]
2015-10-21 13:01   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] app/test: fix reorder library unit test Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-10-30 14:30     ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-11-12 15:42       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-21 13:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update maintainer for reorder library Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2015-11-12 15:47   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1445424644-9910-2-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --to=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).