DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: reset device properly
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 12:10:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1447301441-10590-2-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447301441-10590-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>

Currently, we reset all fields of a device to zero when reset
happens, which is wrong, since for some fields like device_fh,
ifname, and virt_qp_nb, they should be same and be kept after
reset until the device is removed. And this is what's the new
helper function reset_device() for.

And use rte_zmalloc() instead of rte_malloc, so that we could
avoid init_device(), which basically dose zero reset only so far.
Hence, init_device() is dropped in this patch.

This patch also removes a hack of using the offset a specific
field (which is virtqueue now) inside of `virtio_net' structure
to do reset, which could be broken easily if someone changed the
field order without caution.

Cc: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>
Cc: Xie Huawei <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>

---

This patch is based on:

http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/8818/
---
 lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c
index 39a6a5e..cc917da 100644
--- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c
+++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ cleanup_device(struct virtio_net *dev)
 		munmap((void *)(uintptr_t)dev->mem->mapped_address,
 			(size_t)dev->mem->mapped_size);
 		free(dev->mem);
+		dev->mem = NULL;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < dev->virt_qp_nb; i++) {
@@ -306,20 +307,18 @@ alloc_vring_queue_pair(struct virtio_net *dev, uint32_t qp_idx)
 }
 
 /*
- *  Initialise all variables in device structure.
+ * Reset some variables in device structure, while keeping few
+ * others untouched, such as device_fh, ifname, virt_qp_nb: they
+ * should be same unless the device is removed.
  */
 static void
-init_device(struct virtio_net *dev)
+reset_device(struct virtio_net *dev)
 {
-	int vq_offset;
 	uint32_t i;
 
-	/*
-	 * Virtqueues have already been malloced so
-	 * we don't want to set them to NULL.
-	 */
-	vq_offset = offsetof(struct virtio_net, virtqueue);
-	memset(dev, 0, vq_offset);
+	dev->features = 0;
+	dev->protocol_features = 0;
+	dev->flags = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < dev->virt_qp_nb; i++)
 		init_vring_queue_pair(dev, i);
@@ -336,7 +335,7 @@ new_device(struct vhost_device_ctx ctx)
 	struct virtio_net_config_ll *new_ll_dev;
 
 	/* Setup device and virtqueues. */
-	new_ll_dev = rte_malloc(NULL, sizeof(struct virtio_net_config_ll), 0);
+	new_ll_dev = rte_zmalloc(NULL, sizeof(struct virtio_net_config_ll), 0);
 	if (new_ll_dev == NULL) {
 		RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
 			"(%"PRIu64") Failed to allocate memory for dev.\n",
@@ -344,9 +343,6 @@ new_device(struct vhost_device_ctx ctx)
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	/* Initialise device and virtqueues. */
-	init_device(&new_ll_dev->dev);
-
 	new_ll_dev->next = NULL;
 
 	/* Add entry to device configuration linked list. */
@@ -430,7 +426,6 @@ static int
 reset_owner(struct vhost_device_ctx ctx)
 {
 	struct virtio_net *dev;
-	uint64_t device_fh;
 
 	dev = get_device(ctx);
 	if (dev == NULL)
@@ -439,10 +434,8 @@ reset_owner(struct vhost_device_ctx ctx)
 	if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_RUNNING)
 		notify_ops->destroy_device(dev);
 
-	device_fh = dev->device_fh;
 	cleanup_device(dev);
-	init_device(dev);
-	dev->device_fh = device_fh;
+	reset_device(dev);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.0

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-12  4:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-12  4:10 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim to be reviewer of virtio/vhost component Yuanhan Liu
2015-11-12  4:10 ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2015-11-12  8:31   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: reset device properly Rich Lane
2015-11-12 11:31     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-12 11:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: claim to be reviewer of virtio/vhost component Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1447301441-10590-2-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).