DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_port: fix sink port statistics
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 20:41:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1448916070-31815-2-git-send-email-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448916070-31815-1-git-send-email-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>

Fixes the sink port statistics incomplete problem. The problem was
introduced by commit "Packet Framework librte_port: Source/Sink ports"
(commit id ef3403fb6f9a3c4b730d2e4fbe7ddc0291ffa992)

Signed-off-by: Fan Zhang <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
---
 lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 59 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.c b/lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.c
index 234ab18..ab362e1 100644
--- a/lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.c
+++ b/lib/librte_port/rte_port_source_sink.c
@@ -133,28 +133,64 @@ rte_port_source_stats_read(void *port,
 /*
  * Port SINK
  */
+#ifdef RTE_PORT_STATS_COLLECT
+
+#define RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(port, val) \
+	(port->stats.n_pkts_in += val)
+#define RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(port, val) \
+	(port->stats.n_pkts_drop += val)
+
+#else
+
+#define RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(port, val)
+#define RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(port, val)
+
+#endif
+
+struct rte_port_sink {
+	struct rte_port_out_stats stats;
+};
+
 static void *
-rte_port_sink_create(__rte_unused void *params, __rte_unused int socket_id)
+rte_port_sink_create(__rte_unused void *params, int socket_id)
 {
-	return (void *) 1;
+	struct rte_port_sink *port;
+
+	/* Memory allocation */
+	port = rte_zmalloc_socket("PORT", sizeof(*port),
+			RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, socket_id);
+	if (port == NULL) {
+		RTE_LOG(ERR, PORT, "%s: Failed to allocate port\n", __func__);
+		return NULL;
+	}
+
+	return port;
 }
 
 static int
-rte_port_sink_tx(__rte_unused void *port, struct rte_mbuf *pkt)
+rte_port_sink_tx(void *port, struct rte_mbuf *pkt)
 {
+	__rte_unused struct rte_port_sink *p = (struct rte_port_sink *) port;
+
+	RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, 1);
 	rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
+	RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, 1);
 
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int
-rte_port_sink_tx_bulk(__rte_unused void *port, struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
+rte_port_sink_tx_bulk(void *port, struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
 	uint64_t pkts_mask)
 {
+	__rte_unused struct rte_port_sink *p = (struct rte_port_sink *) port;
+
 	if ((pkts_mask & (pkts_mask + 1)) == 0) {
 		uint64_t n_pkts = __builtin_popcountll(pkts_mask);
 		uint32_t i;
 
+		RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, n_pkts);
+		RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, n_pkts);
 		for (i = 0; i < n_pkts; i++) {
 			struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[i];
 
@@ -166,6 +202,8 @@ rte_port_sink_tx_bulk(__rte_unused void *port, struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
 			uint64_t pkt_mask = 1LLU << pkt_index;
 			struct rte_mbuf *pkt = pkts[pkt_index];
 
+			RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_IN_ADD(p, 1);
+			RTE_PORT_SINK_STATS_PKTS_DROP_ADD(p, 1);
 			rte_pktmbuf_free(pkt);
 			pkts_mask &= ~pkt_mask;
 		}
@@ -174,6 +212,22 @@ rte_port_sink_tx_bulk(__rte_unused void *port, struct rte_mbuf **pkts,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int
+rte_port_sink_stats_read(void *port, struct rte_port_out_stats *stats,
+		int clear)
+{
+	struct rte_port_sink *p =
+		(struct rte_port_sink *) port;
+
+	if (stats != NULL)
+		memcpy(stats, &p->stats, sizeof(p->stats));
+
+	if (clear)
+		memset(&p->stats, 0, sizeof(p->stats));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Summary of port operations
  */
@@ -190,4 +244,5 @@ struct rte_port_out_ops rte_port_sink_ops = {
 	.f_tx = rte_port_sink_tx,
 	.f_tx_bulk = rte_port_sink_tx_bulk,
 	.f_flush = NULL,
+	.f_stats = rte_port_sink_stats_read,
 };
-- 
2.5.0

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-30 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-30 20:41 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_port: fix mbuf allocation in source port Fan Zhang
2015-11-30 20:41 ` Fan Zhang [this message]
2015-12-06 23:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_port: fix sink port statistics Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-06 23:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_port: fix mbuf allocation in source port Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1448916070-31815-2-git-send-email-roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --to=roy.fan.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).