From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC47A04C2; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:24:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E6E1C1AB; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:23:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new1-smtp.messagingengine.com (new1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.221]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91A21C19C; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:23:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4510D580391; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:23:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:23:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= SbYAr6XQeEFCem9DbhyuYKQfU46GMaKCaFRVpEZubHY=; b=mat4/Y4Q2FNEkmXa p02I5eULy3oQh0woTO958kUOgHv6oGK7U7o2mpOdHFtNjGee3JrEcMowD5jTWahe R+0/AbjztFKdw8XrxCSk+vHGMNVvKju59Wn5qWrVd3QGiOZ8ab8xxeZIK0y3lxs0 e+I6nNRlG//+YR8uZNK6Kwap7KOLDEpfWhUhQd7YVJu+2nxeQSeyMfIBu74K1YzU GmVDXPE0DAnMeJPXL31FzH2bM8gWOzBQVajhOM7aLDPAhvdY8neVXNGi0wxZUtfz df4H+RIH0hJXGs4yC96y8RRcnhIs3bkzfmAtI8ig0IIT29lSWNQHu6y5WjSM4KG9 S0nnxg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=SbYAr6XQeEFCem9DbhyuYKQfU46GMaKCaFRVpEZub HY=; b=ig6Q/mzkCBv/KP31vTs3GKfhvkRU6F+XfreIiBLP73dEgEZz54LHh7sDq OmVTeC+PeEmXf3UgxAtRQEg5tYUobVjch1a2JzJpzE9YDLjbLH6+I8pFJQZot77u BNfRQ3FMLU0XoiyVmMV88mtDDHxQ+qwqI1daPmfdYKanvLtNz6zcmK5LHonJnLh7 32WoCiYPtoG6MhVoqma3UlFF4oJN0jBqr1ZAJIsx73PVjklY+3lZwNbP7YsfRE6d 94kEdm8R7T9L8V5IuS4hSEErVTtUShXHUnogIAEG/LJu5AZrqTdyGziSTmdb+Fej CLXElO29ZmvmMjSiXP4GsyPQr8GqQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrledvgdehudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepleefrdeirddugeelrdduudegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdr nhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6C281328005E; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 08:23:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Maxime Coquelin , Bruce Richardson , "Dybkowski, AdamX" , "Trahe, Fiona" , Hemant Agrawal Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "dev@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, Roy Fan" , "stephen@networkplumber.org" , "Burakov, Anatoly" , "bluca@debian.org" , Akhil Goyal , "Mcnamara, John" , "techboard@dpdk.org" Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 14:23:51 +0200 Message-ID: <145205346.Q2VnLu3xmU@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200727094113.2849-1-adamx.dybkowski@intel.com> <58ac857c-7ec0-4d84-755c-ba81e1e57aac@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH] doc: scheduler API deprecation notice X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 12/08/2020 12:57, Hemant Agrawal: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: techboard On Behalf Of Maxime > > Coquelin > > > > On 8/12/20 12:22 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 12/08/2020 11:52, Bruce Richardson: > > >> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 02:50:57PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > >>> 10/08/2020 13:49, Trahe, Fiona: > > >>>> Sorry about that Thomas, Akhil, we should have chased up acks sooner. > > >>>> > > >>>> Given the proposed content of the patch, and the similar changes > > >>>> that are recommended and agreed throughout DPDK do you think an > > >>>> exception can be made and that this change can get into 20.11 even > > without the deprecation notice being in 20.08? > > >>> > > >>> That's a question for techboard. > > >>> > > >>> PS: please avoid top-posting > > >>> > > >> My initial 2c is that we should allow this, and add the required > > >> deprecation notice to the online docs immediately. I would assume > > >> most people use the online docs rather than building their own from > > >> the package, therefore adding in a deprecation notice to the online > > >> versions a few days after a release should not be a major problem IMHO. > > >> > > >> Also, given the fact that we have once-a-year at most to apply ABI > > >> changes, and this is the first time we are going this, so I think a > > >> little latitude should be given! :-) > > > > > > I agree > > > > > > We need more opinions from other techboard members to make it a > > decision. > > > > > > > > > > I agree too, let's give a bit more flexibility for the deprecation notice. > > > > Maxime > > +1 > Hemant I've applied the patch after 20.11-rc0.