From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: coding style: use linux kernel style for indentation
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:58:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452671929-29617-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Using two tabs for "if" (or "while") statements is a bit weird to me.
Also, using one tab unconditionaly for function definitions and
prototypes doesn't look great.
Here I'd suggest to use the indentation style the Linux kernel
project prefers: to align with the open brace with tabs and
additonal spaces (when necessary).
Example:
static int
rte_eal_foo_bar(int a_long_argument_1, int another_long_argument_2,
struct foo *yet_another_long_argument_3)
ret = rte_eal_foo_bar(a_long_argument_1, another_long_argument_2,
yet_another_long_argument_3);
if (really_long_variable_name_1 == really_long_variable_name_2 &&
var3 == var4) {
x = y + z;
....;
}
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: Siobhan Butler <siobhan.a.butler@intel.com>
Cc: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst
index ad1392d..23cd060 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst
@@ -339,9 +339,11 @@ General
* Do not put any spaces before a tab for indentation.
* If you have to wrap a long statement, put the operator at the end of the line, and indent again.
-* For control statements (if, while, etc.), continuation it is recommended that the next line be indented by two tabs, rather than one,
- to prevent confusion as to whether the second line of the control statement forms part of the statement body or not.
- Alternatively, the line continuation may use additional spaces to line up to an appropriately point on the preceding line, for example, to align to an opening brace.
+* For control statements (if, while, etc.), function definitions and
+ function prototypes continuation lines, it is recommended that the
+ next line be indented by tab and additional spaces when necessary
+ to align to the opening brace. For others, it's also okay to be
+ indented by tab only.
.. note::
@@ -350,17 +352,29 @@ General
.. code-block:: c
while (really_long_variable_name_1 == really_long_variable_name_2 &&
- var3 == var4){ /* confusing to read as */
- x = y + z; /* control stmt body lines up with second line of */
- a = b + c; /* control statement itself if single indent used */
+ var3 == var4) { /* confusing to read as */
+ x = y + z; /* control stmt body lines up with second line of */
+ a = b + c; /* control statement itself if single indent used */
}
if (really_long_variable_name_1 == really_long_variable_name_2 &&
- var3 == var4){ /* two tabs used */
- x = y + z; /* statement body no longer lines up */
- a = b + c;
+ var3 == var4) { /* align with above opening if statement */
+ x = y + z; /* statement body no longer lines up */
+ a = b + c;
}
+ /* The continuation line is indented with two tab + 1 space */
+ static int
+ rte_eal_foo_bar(int a_long_argument_1, int another_long_argument_2,
+ struct foo *yet_another_long_argument_3)
+ {
+ ...
+ }
+
+ /* The continuation line is indented with two tab + 7 spaces */
+ ret = rte_eal_foo_bar(a_long_argument_1, another_long_argument_2,
+ yet_another_long_argument_3);
+
z = a + really + long + statement + that + needs +
two + lines + gets + indented + on + the +
second + and + subsequent + lines;
@@ -510,9 +524,9 @@ Prototypes
.. code-block:: c
static char *function1(int _arg, const char *_arg2,
- struct foo *_arg3,
- struct bar *_arg4,
- struct baz *_arg5);
+ struct foo *_arg3,
+ struct bar *_arg4,
+ struct baz *_arg5);
static void usage(void);
.. note::
--
1.9.0
next reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 7:58 Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2016-01-13 15:07 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-01-13 16:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-02-13 12:51 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-02-13 13:12 ` Yuanhan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1452671929-29617-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).