DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: coding style: use linux kernel style for indentation
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:58:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1452671929-29617-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Using two tabs for "if" (or "while") statements is a bit weird to me.
Also, using one tab unconditionaly for function definitions and
prototypes doesn't look great.

Here I'd suggest to use the indentation style the Linux kernel
project prefers: to align with the open brace with tabs and
additonal spaces (when necessary).

Example:

  static int
  rte_eal_foo_bar(int a_long_argument_1, int another_long_argument_2,
                  struct foo *yet_another_long_argument_3)

  ret = rte_eal_foo_bar(a_long_argument_1, another_long_argument_2,
                        yet_another_long_argument_3);

  if (really_long_variable_name_1 == really_long_variable_name_2 &&
      var3 == var4) {
          x = y + z;
          ....;
  }

Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: Siobhan Butler <siobhan.a.butler@intel.com>
Cc: John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
---
 doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst b/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst
index ad1392d..23cd060 100644
--- a/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/contributing/coding_style.rst
@@ -339,9 +339,11 @@ General
 
 * Do not put any spaces before a tab for indentation.
 * If you have to wrap a long statement, put the operator at the end of the line, and indent again.
-* For control statements (if, while, etc.), continuation it is recommended that the next line be indented by two tabs, rather than one,
-  to prevent confusion as to whether the second line of the control statement forms part of the statement body or not.
-  Alternatively, the line continuation may use additional spaces to line up to an appropriately point on the preceding line, for example, to align to an opening brace.
+* For control statements (if, while, etc.), function definitions and
+  function prototypes continuation lines, it is recommended that the
+  next line be indented by tab and additional spaces when necessary
+  to align to the opening brace. For others, it's also okay to be
+  indented by tab only.
 
 .. note::
 
@@ -350,17 +352,29 @@ General
 .. code-block:: c
 
  while (really_long_variable_name_1 == really_long_variable_name_2 &&
-     var3 == var4){  /* confusing to read as */
-     x = y + z;      /* control stmt body lines up with second line of */
-     a = b + c;      /* control statement itself if single indent used */
+         var3 == var4) { /* confusing to read as */
+         x = y + z;      /* control stmt body lines up with second line of */
+         a = b + c;      /* control statement itself if single indent used */
  }
 
  if (really_long_variable_name_1 == really_long_variable_name_2 &&
-         var3 == var4){  /* two tabs used */
-     x = y + z;          /* statement body no longer lines up */
-     a = b + c;
+     var3 == var4) {            /* align with above opening if statement */
+         x = y + z;             /* statement body no longer lines up */
+         a = b + c;
  }
 
+ /* The continuation line is indented with two tab + 1 space */
+ static int
+ rte_eal_foo_bar(int a_long_argument_1, int another_long_argument_2,
+                 struct foo *yet_another_long_argument_3)
+ {
+        ...
+ }
+
+ /* The continuation line is indented with two tab + 7 spaces */
+ ret = rte_eal_foo_bar(a_long_argument_1, another_long_argument_2,
+                       yet_another_long_argument_3);
+
  z = a + really + long + statement + that + needs +
          two + lines + gets + indented + on + the +
          second + and + subsequent + lines;
@@ -510,9 +524,9 @@ Prototypes
 .. code-block:: c
 
  static char *function1(int _arg, const char *_arg2,
-        struct foo *_arg3,
-        struct bar *_arg4,
-        struct baz *_arg5);
+                        struct foo *_arg3,
+                        struct bar *_arg4,
+                        struct baz *_arg5);
  static void usage(void);
 
 .. note::
-- 
1.9.0

             reply	other threads:[~2016-01-13  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-13  7:58 Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2016-01-13 15:07 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-01-13 16:49   ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-02-13 12:51     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-02-13 13:12       ` Yuanhan Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1452671929-29617-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).