From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pa0-f47.google.com (mail-pa0-f47.google.com [209.85.220.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BC1591A for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 11:26:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id uo6so21668995pac.1 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:26:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mvista-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=IsBExO4QaIKzJwsuYNAb5FtlJNed7RPi4b1cxrVlSLI=; b=kl/Th2emg086wc4IAlyJxm/rbHoa3r/YbdoEZ/ZfqZJNA12MV1X0v6UlvJiMBOaSSE euyqIqS03db/6FEWYWcm9gTvQQKFAWzLsyqDtLYLPTWVBnnk7FNW5Os8XTRo2CNN4nVy J7s6LfRX+L43NgKdYAED0+eIdM6MeGBFE415R5jfi/56IwLzIFMCOp5Merg+ilFz7/0Z NxmNw7Ry2VY3qAXkLwg5gN6Hs6J8aAN+NMsj106wmwQJl2I6UlfbzEkG8xBVcLzb1dHZ T+rIWfmb5lEAWyjKyCNat5YWc0lqU1QusNjQ/PqoO56e6I7Sd713uN9qJy9S1Dy1gmHW eRww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=IsBExO4QaIKzJwsuYNAb5FtlJNed7RPi4b1cxrVlSLI=; b=jGQjg5su7MAezgmm08m5xPBY16qIOASNNLV9LETHq73+lPzkI01GewCHKcTdjku8SF xkMHxrUJlN92HLbmuMn7WfrQIZPhUAJrNwY1wmqbouSC/fIdW3zw/NN3EKlUbZ6tSk8J TfzuyMgYucIGiH1OPRnpso2WOAjrCLDIjDxRqI2G0iuWq1zW9OGUv90T0Djl3pYWgaZI X4n4p+ZH+6/Lazw2YhfEL1jdB+cdHUZ6NoPmYcmnjzw6Nnck/lVtkaky463sviK8MRZ1 WWvnm6DOleqhltUvQaZ6G0pG/L6E+q/GDKN692tl87S5RiIgxfL6uviTYgCKNtOwaHhE Ij5g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmGIk4CmPyMGGA/EC1s9gdAwpN+Wke/3TvjGdUQY1WJdjhRkg6ZA1uCYCAHd/FioQiSNGZXnAsmFURc1g2/iz9hdJ1sCA== X-Received: by 10.66.129.232 with SMTP id nz8mr59742042pab.102.1453371985060; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:26:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from santosh-Latitude-E5530-non-vPro.mvista.com ([111.93.218.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id uk10sm1495384pab.31.2016.01.21.02.26.21 (version=TLS1_1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 02:26:24 -0800 (PST) From: Santosh Shukla To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:56:03 +0530 Message-Id: <1453371964-3354-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/11] eal/linux: never check iopl for arm X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:26:26 -0000 iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0 value. Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla Acked-by: Jan Viktorin Suggested-by: Stephen Hemminger --- v5 --> v5: - Renamed patch titled from "linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init()" to current, Suggested by David. v5 patch was this[1] [1] http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/9978/ lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c index 635ec36..a2a3485 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal.c @@ -715,6 +715,8 @@ rte_eal_iopl_init(void) if (iopl(3) != 0) return -1; return 0; +#elif defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM) || defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64) + return 0; /* iopl syscall not supported for ARM/ARM64 */ #else return -1; #endif -- 1.7.9.5