From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0ACC6CC for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:43:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wgfq1 with SMTP id q1so19056064wgf.1 for ; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:43:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=JVD3g9pSfKCRfGsgubScwCOaFq5+O6BM/SbOLWk9A8Y=; b=T6iruyca0calap13VTXNSenM4Pf/b1vdT8nHitI/srG/eeb0ANOlnbVuXMMihGwVW+ Ho2PJFgCsxNd4pZ3Uvw5KBkD6ug5bAjijiRVyAh9spKb0NyoD/YHOsilNLR2hoJxviOK TGgLysGk73REKgpeR8+EontOT4Rdf3/oSmRane/FfMiXNiRC2d0xHnZUovsuy+V+xfNe cLLd39zSkR7uETt9HnHyZB2R5H4+H1VSQF9qOlbJGJ7pDmz9st9rME9pDhtst0EnCyf5 3CG/f4lHwPoaBco0QiO01+j5Op+///feXRZ+DxOSb9hIH+thJSDa7R4AZow9dJBtcHiA uxkg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmJZnagIeXXriwuL1ij/AKicrjbR9jnOuYR80gE3lZAGEuEJkW6zdkwHe7X6lV8l7X6jvX5 X-Received: by 10.194.134.74 with SMTP id pi10mr15710674wjb.99.1434638601206; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wi1sm12589691wjb.41.2015.06.18.07.43.18 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 Jun 2015 07:43:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: "Gajdzica, MaciejX T" Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:42:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1455064.PMMjulFsjS@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891263236B051@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <1432211324-5078-1-git-send-email-maciejx.t.gajdzica@intel.com> <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891263236B051@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] port: add ethdev_writer and ring_writer nodrop ports X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 14:43:21 -0000 > > When nodrop writer port fails to send data, it retries until reach maximum > > number of retries. Also added new tx_bulk implementation for ring writer > > port. > > > > Changes in v2: > > - added missing signoffs > > > > Changes in v3: > > - removed second implementation of tx_bulk functions > > > > Maciej Gajdzica (4): > > port: removed second implementation of tx_bulk from ethdev_writer > > port > > port: changed tx_bulk implementation if ring_writer port > > port: added ethdev_writer_nodrop port > > port: added ring_writer_nodrop port > > Acked-by: Cristian Dumitrescu Applied, thanks