From: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: Malicious Driver Detection not supported by ixgbe
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 13:33:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1456291984-7309-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com> (raw)
Signed-off-by: Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>
---
doc/guides/nics/ixgbe.rst | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_04.rst | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/ixgbe.rst b/doc/guides/nics/ixgbe.rst
index 8cae299..aac5586 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/ixgbe.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/ixgbe.rst
@@ -147,6 +147,27 @@ The following MACROs are used for these three features:
* ETH_TXQ_FLAGS_NOXSUMTCP
+Malicious Driver Detection not Supported by ixgbe
+^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+On Intel x550 series NICs, HW supports a feature called MDD (Malcicious
+Driver Detection).
+MDD is used to check the behavior of the VF driver. It means when transmitting
+packets, the VF must use the advanced context descriptor and set it correctly.
+And VF must set the CC (Check Context) bit either.
+DPDK PF doesn't support MDD. We may hit problem in this scenario kernel PF +
+DPDK VF. If user enables MDD in kernel PF, DPDK VF will not work. Because
+kernel PF thinks the VF is malicious. But actually it's not. The only reason
+is the VF doesn't act as MDD required.
+There's significant performance impact to support MDD. DPDK should check if
+the advanced context descriptor should be set and set it. And DPDK has to ask
+the info about the header length from the upper layer, because parsing the
+packet itself is not acceptale. So, it's too expensive to support MDD.
+When using kernel PF + DPDK VF on x550, please make sure using the kernel
+driver that disables MDD or can disable MDD. (Some kernel driver can use
+this CLI 'insmod ixgbe.ko MDD=0,0' to disable MDD. Some kernel driver disable
+it by default.)
+
Sample Application Notes
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_04.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_04.rst
index 5786f74..df81c54 100644
--- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_04.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_04.rst
@@ -90,6 +90,30 @@ This section should contain new known issues in this release. Sample format:
tense. Add information on any known workarounds.
+Restriction
+-----------
+
+* **Malicious Driver Detection is not supported by ixgbe**
+
+ On Intel x550 series NICs, HW supports a feature called MDD (Malcicious
+ Driver Detection).
+ MDD is used to check the behavior of the VF driver. It means when transmitting
+ packets, the VF must use the advanced context descriptor and set it correctly.
+ And VF must set the CC (Check Context) bit either.
+ DPDK PF doesn't support MDD. We may hit problem in this scenario kernel PF +
+ DPDK VF. If user enables MDD in kernel PF, DPDK VF will not work. Because
+ kernel PF thinks the VF is malicious. But actually it's not. The only reason
+ is the VF doesn't act as MDD required.
+ There's significant performance impact to support MDD. DPDK should check if
+ the advanced context descriptor should be set and set it. And DPDK has to ask
+ the info about the header length from the upper layer, because parsing the
+ packet itself is not acceptale. So, it's too expensive to support MDD.
+ When using kernel PF + DPDK VF on x550, please make sure using the kernel
+ driver that disables MDD or can disable MDD. (Some kernel driver can use
+ this CLI 'insmod ixgbe.ko MDD=0,0' to disable MDD. Some kernel driver disable
+ it by default.)
+
+
API Changes
-----------
--
1.9.3
next reply other threads:[~2016-02-24 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-24 5:33 Wenzhuo Lu [this message]
2016-02-24 17:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-02-25 1:13 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-02-26 4:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Wenzhuo Lu
2016-02-26 14:41 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-29 1:38 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-03-06 22:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-07 0:45 ` Lu, Wenzhuo
2016-03-07 5:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Wenzhuo Lu
2016-03-07 20:57 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1456291984-7309-1-git-send-email-wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--to=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).