From: Dhana Eadala <edreddy@gmail.com>
To: bruce.richardson@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com,
michael.qiu@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Dhana Eadala <edreddy@gmail.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: fix memcmp function pointer in multi-process environment
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 22:16:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1457921808-14261-1-git-send-email-edreddy@gmail.com> (raw)
We found a problem in dpdk-2.2 using under multi-process environment.
Here is the brief description how we are using the dpdk:
We have two processes proc1, proc2 using dpdk. These proc1 and proc2 are
two different compiled binaries.
proc1 is started as primary process and proc2 as secondary process.
proc1:
Calls srcHash = rte_hash_create("src_hash_name") to create rte_hash structure.
As part of this, this api initalized the rte_hash structure and set the
srcHash->rte_hash_cmp_eq to the address of memcmp() from proc1 address space.
proc2:
calls srcHash = rte_hash_find_existing("src_hash_name").
This function call returns the rte_hash created by proc1.
This srcHash->rte_hash_cmp_eq still points to the address of
memcmp() from proc1 address space.
Later proc2 calls
rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(srcHash, (const void*) &key, key.sig);
rte_hash_lookup_with_hash() invokes __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(),
which in turn calls h->rte_hash_cmp_eq(key, k->key, h->key_len).
This leads to a crash as h->rte_hash_cmp_eq is an address
from proc1 address space and is invalid address in proc2 address space.
We found, from dpdk documentation, that
"
The use of function pointers between multiple processes
running based of different compiled
binaries is not supported, since the location of a given function
in one process may be different to
its location in a second. This prevents the librte_hash library
from behaving properly as in a multi-
threaded instance, since it uses a pointer to the hash function internally.
To work around this issue, it is recommended that
multi-process applications perform the hash
calculations by directly calling the hashing function
from the code and then using the
rte_hash_add_with_hash()/rte_hash_lookup_with_hash() functions
instead of the functions which do
the hashing internally, such as rte_hash_add()/rte_hash_lookup().
"
We did follow the recommended steps by invoking rte_hash_lookup_with_hash().
It was no issue up to and including dpdk-2.0.
In later releases started crashing because rte_hash_cmp_eq is
introduced in dpdk-2.1
We fixed it with the following patch and would like to
submit the patch to dpdk.org.
Patch is created such that, if anyone wanted to use dpdk in
multi-process environment with function pointers not shared, they need to
define RTE_LIB_MP_NO_FUNC_PTR in their Makefile.
Without defining this flag in Makefile, it works as it is now.
Signed-off-by: Dhana Eadala <edreddy@gmail.com>
---
lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
index 3e3167c..0946777 100644
--- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
+++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
@@ -594,7 +594,11 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
prim_bkt->signatures[i].alt == alt_hash) {
k = (struct rte_hash_key *) ((char *)keys +
prim_bkt->key_idx[i] * h->key_entry_size);
+#ifdef RTE_LIB_MP_NO_FUNC_PTR
+ if (memcmp(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#else
if (h->rte_hash_cmp_eq(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#endif
/* Enqueue index of free slot back in the ring. */
enqueue_slot_back(h, cached_free_slots, slot_id);
/* Update data */
@@ -614,7 +618,11 @@ __rte_hash_add_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
sec_bkt->signatures[i].current == alt_hash) {
k = (struct rte_hash_key *) ((char *)keys +
sec_bkt->key_idx[i] * h->key_entry_size);
+#ifdef RTE_LIB_MP_NO_FUNC_PTR
+ if (memcmp(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#else
if (h->rte_hash_cmp_eq(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#endif
/* Enqueue index of free slot back in the ring. */
enqueue_slot_back(h, cached_free_slots, slot_id);
/* Update data */
@@ -725,7 +733,11 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
bkt->signatures[i].sig != NULL_SIGNATURE) {
k = (struct rte_hash_key *) ((char *)keys +
bkt->key_idx[i] * h->key_entry_size);
+#ifdef RTE_LIB_MP_NO_FUNC_PTR
+ if (memcmp (key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#else
if (h->rte_hash_cmp_eq(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#endif
if (data != NULL)
*data = k->pdata;
/*
@@ -748,7 +760,11 @@ __rte_hash_lookup_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
bkt->signatures[i].alt == sig) {
k = (struct rte_hash_key *) ((char *)keys +
bkt->key_idx[i] * h->key_entry_size);
+#ifdef RTE_LIB_MP_NO_FUNC_PTR
+ if (memcmp(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#else
if (h->rte_hash_cmp_eq(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#endif
if (data != NULL)
*data = k->pdata;
/*
@@ -840,7 +856,11 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
bkt->signatures[i].sig != NULL_SIGNATURE) {
k = (struct rte_hash_key *) ((char *)keys +
bkt->key_idx[i] * h->key_entry_size);
+#ifdef RTE_LIB_MP_NO_FUNC_PTR
+ if (memcmp(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#else
if (h->rte_hash_cmp_eq(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#endif
remove_entry(h, bkt, i);
/*
@@ -863,7 +883,11 @@ __rte_hash_del_key_with_hash(const struct rte_hash *h, const void *key,
bkt->signatures[i].sig != NULL_SIGNATURE) {
k = (struct rte_hash_key *) ((char *)keys +
bkt->key_idx[i] * h->key_entry_size);
+#ifdef RTE_LIB_MP_NO_FUNC_PTR
+ if (memcmp(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#else
if (h->rte_hash_cmp_eq(key, k->key, h->key_len) == 0) {
+#endif
remove_entry(h, bkt, i);
/*
@@ -980,7 +1004,11 @@ lookup_stage3(unsigned idx, const struct rte_hash_key *key_slot, const void * co
unsigned hit;
unsigned key_idx;
+#ifdef RTE_LIB_MP_NO_FUNC_PTR
+ hit = !memcmp(key_slot->key, keys[idx], h->key_len);
+#else
hit = !h->rte_hash_cmp_eq(key_slot->key, keys[idx], h->key_len);
+#endif
if (data != NULL)
data[idx] = key_slot->pdata;
--
2.5.0
next reply other threads:[~2016-03-14 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-14 2:16 Dhana Eadala [this message]
2016-03-14 2:30 ` 张伟
2016-03-14 4:38 ` 张伟
2016-03-15 0:57 ` Dhananjaya Eadala
2016-03-15 1:02 ` 张伟
2016-03-24 14:00 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-01 13:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-22 11:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-22 19:53 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-19 4:58 ` [dpdk-dev] rte_hash_del_key crash " 张伟
2016-04-19 7:39 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-19 21:12 ` 张伟
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-03-03 3:35 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] hash: fix memcmp function pointer " Dhana Eadala
2016-03-03 5:44 ` Qiu, Michael
2016-03-04 1:00 ` Dhananjaya Reddy Eadala
2016-03-09 21:36 ` Dhananjaya Reddy Eadala
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1457921808-14261-1-git-send-email-edreddy@gmail.com \
--to=edreddy@gmail.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=michael.qiu@intel.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).