From: Maciej Czekaj <Maciej.Czekaj@caviumnetworks.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, <tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] l3fwd: Fix compilation with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 07:23:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458109404-27626-1-git-send-email-Maciej.Czekaj@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458084216-20942-1-git-send-email-Maciej.Czekaj@caviumnetworks.com>
l3fwd does not compile with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP.
2 issues:
* in 64d395 mask0 changed type from xmm_t to rte_xmm_t
-> use x field from rte_xmm_t
* in dc81eb dst_port parameter changed to uint32_t
-> change uint16_t dst_port to uin32_t dsp_port
Signed-off-by: Maciej Czekaj <Maciej.Czekaj@caviumnetworks.com>
---
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h
index d3388da..891ae2e 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
static inline void
em_get_dst_port_ipv4x8(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct rte_mbuf *m[8],
- uint8_t portid, uint16_t dst_port[8])
+ uint8_t portid, uint32_t dst_port[8])
{
int32_t ret[8];
union ipv4_5tuple_host key[8];
@@ -77,14 +77,14 @@ em_get_dst_port_ipv4x8(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct rte_mbuf *m[8],
sizeof(struct ether_hdr) +
offsetof(struct ipv4_hdr, time_to_live)));
- key[0].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[0], mask0);
- key[1].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[1], mask0);
- key[2].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[2], mask0);
- key[3].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[3], mask0);
- key[4].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[4], mask0);
- key[5].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[5], mask0);
- key[6].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[6], mask0);
- key[7].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[7], mask0);
+ key[0].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[0], mask0.x);
+ key[1].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[1], mask0.x);
+ key[2].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[2], mask0.x);
+ key[3].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[3], mask0.x);
+ key[4].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[4], mask0.x);
+ key[5].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[5], mask0.x);
+ key[6].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[6], mask0.x);
+ key[7].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[7], mask0.x);
const void *key_array[8] = {&key[0], &key[1], &key[2], &key[3],
&key[4], &key[5], &key[6], &key[7]};
@@ -170,19 +170,19 @@ get_ipv6_5tuple(struct rte_mbuf *m0, __m128i mask0,
static inline void
em_get_dst_port_ipv6x8(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct rte_mbuf *m[8],
- uint8_t portid, uint16_t dst_port[8])
+ uint8_t portid, uint32_t dst_port[8])
{
int32_t ret[8];
union ipv6_5tuple_host key[8];
- get_ipv6_5tuple(m[0], mask1, mask2, &key[0]);
- get_ipv6_5tuple(m[1], mask1, mask2, &key[1]);
- get_ipv6_5tuple(m[2], mask1, mask2, &key[2]);
- get_ipv6_5tuple(m[3], mask1, mask2, &key[3]);
- get_ipv6_5tuple(m[4], mask1, mask2, &key[4]);
- get_ipv6_5tuple(m[5], mask1, mask2, &key[5]);
- get_ipv6_5tuple(m[6], mask1, mask2, &key[6]);
- get_ipv6_5tuple(m[7], mask1, mask2, &key[7]);
+ get_ipv6_5tuple(m[0], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[0]);
+ get_ipv6_5tuple(m[1], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[1]);
+ get_ipv6_5tuple(m[2], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[2]);
+ get_ipv6_5tuple(m[3], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[3]);
+ get_ipv6_5tuple(m[4], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[4]);
+ get_ipv6_5tuple(m[5], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[5]);
+ get_ipv6_5tuple(m[6], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[6]);
+ get_ipv6_5tuple(m[7], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[7]);
const void *key_array[8] = {&key[0], &key[1], &key[2], &key[3],
&key[4], &key[5], &key[6], &key[7]};
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ l3fwd_em_send_packets(int nb_rx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts_burst,
uint8_t portid, struct lcore_conf *qconf)
{
int32_t j;
- uint16_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
+ uint32_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
/*
* Send nb_rx - nb_rx%8 packets
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-15 23:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Maciej Czekaj
2016-03-16 0:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-16 6:23 ` Maciej Czekaj [this message]
2016-03-21 11:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458109404-27626-1-git-send-email-Maciej.Czekaj@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=maciej.czekaj@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).