DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd: Fix compilation with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP
@ 2016-03-15 23:23 Maciej Czekaj
  2016-03-16  0:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
  2016-03-16  6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Maciej Czekaj
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Czekaj @ 2016-03-15 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev; +Cc: thomas.monjalon, tomaszx.kulasek

---
 examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h
index d3388da..891ae2e 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 
 static inline void
 em_get_dst_port_ipv4x8(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct rte_mbuf *m[8],
-		uint8_t portid, uint16_t dst_port[8])
+		uint8_t portid, uint32_t dst_port[8])
 {
 	int32_t ret[8];
 	union ipv4_5tuple_host key[8];
@@ -77,14 +77,14 @@ em_get_dst_port_ipv4x8(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct rte_mbuf *m[8],
 				sizeof(struct ether_hdr) +
 				offsetof(struct ipv4_hdr, time_to_live)));
 
-	key[0].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[0], mask0);
-	key[1].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[1], mask0);
-	key[2].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[2], mask0);
-	key[3].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[3], mask0);
-	key[4].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[4], mask0);
-	key[5].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[5], mask0);
-	key[6].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[6], mask0);
-	key[7].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[7], mask0);
+	key[0].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[0], mask0.x);
+	key[1].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[1], mask0.x);
+	key[2].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[2], mask0.x);
+	key[3].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[3], mask0.x);
+	key[4].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[4], mask0.x);
+	key[5].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[5], mask0.x);
+	key[6].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[6], mask0.x);
+	key[7].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[7], mask0.x);
 
 	const void *key_array[8] = {&key[0], &key[1], &key[2], &key[3],
 				&key[4], &key[5], &key[6], &key[7]};
@@ -170,19 +170,19 @@ get_ipv6_5tuple(struct rte_mbuf *m0, __m128i mask0,
 
 static inline void
 em_get_dst_port_ipv6x8(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct rte_mbuf *m[8],
-		uint8_t portid, uint16_t dst_port[8])
+		uint8_t portid, uint32_t dst_port[8])
 {
 	int32_t ret[8];
 	union ipv6_5tuple_host key[8];
 
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[0], mask1, mask2, &key[0]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[1], mask1, mask2, &key[1]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[2], mask1, mask2, &key[2]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[3], mask1, mask2, &key[3]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[4], mask1, mask2, &key[4]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[5], mask1, mask2, &key[5]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[6], mask1, mask2, &key[6]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[7], mask1, mask2, &key[7]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[0], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[0]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[1], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[1]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[2], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[2]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[3], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[3]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[4], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[4]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[5], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[5]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[6], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[6]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[7], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[7]);
 
 	const void *key_array[8] = {&key[0], &key[1], &key[2], &key[3],
 			&key[4], &key[5], &key[6], &key[7]};
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ l3fwd_em_send_packets(int nb_rx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts_burst,
 		uint8_t portid, struct lcore_conf *qconf)
 {
 	int32_t j;
-	uint16_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
+	uint32_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
 
 	/*
 	 * Send nb_rx - nb_rx%8 packets
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd: Fix compilation with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP
  2016-03-15 23:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd: Fix compilation with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP Maciej Czekaj
@ 2016-03-16  0:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
  2016-03-16  6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Maciej Czekaj
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2016-03-16  0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maciej Czekaj; +Cc: dev, tomaszx.kulasek

Hi,

2016-03-16 00:23, Maciej Czekaj:
> ---
>  examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

You've forgotten the explanation with the Signed-off.
Thanks

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] l3fwd: Fix compilation with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP
  2016-03-15 23:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd: Fix compilation with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP Maciej Czekaj
  2016-03-16  0:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
@ 2016-03-16  6:23 ` Maciej Czekaj
  2016-03-21 11:35   ` Thomas Monjalon
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Maciej Czekaj @ 2016-03-16  6:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dev; +Cc: thomas.monjalon, tomaszx.kulasek

l3fwd does not compile with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP.
2 issues:
 * in 64d395 mask0 changed type from xmm_t to rte_xmm_t
      -> use x field from rte_xmm_t
 * in dc81eb dst_port parameter changed to uint32_t
      -> change uint16_t dst_port to uin32_t dsp_port

Signed-off-by: Maciej Czekaj <Maciej.Czekaj@caviumnetworks.com>
---
 examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h | 38 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h
index d3388da..891ae2e 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em_hlm_sse.h
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 
 static inline void
 em_get_dst_port_ipv4x8(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct rte_mbuf *m[8],
-		uint8_t portid, uint16_t dst_port[8])
+		uint8_t portid, uint32_t dst_port[8])
 {
 	int32_t ret[8];
 	union ipv4_5tuple_host key[8];
@@ -77,14 +77,14 @@ em_get_dst_port_ipv4x8(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct rte_mbuf *m[8],
 				sizeof(struct ether_hdr) +
 				offsetof(struct ipv4_hdr, time_to_live)));
 
-	key[0].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[0], mask0);
-	key[1].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[1], mask0);
-	key[2].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[2], mask0);
-	key[3].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[3], mask0);
-	key[4].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[4], mask0);
-	key[5].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[5], mask0);
-	key[6].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[6], mask0);
-	key[7].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[7], mask0);
+	key[0].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[0], mask0.x);
+	key[1].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[1], mask0.x);
+	key[2].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[2], mask0.x);
+	key[3].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[3], mask0.x);
+	key[4].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[4], mask0.x);
+	key[5].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[5], mask0.x);
+	key[6].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[6], mask0.x);
+	key[7].xmm = _mm_and_si128(data[7], mask0.x);
 
 	const void *key_array[8] = {&key[0], &key[1], &key[2], &key[3],
 				&key[4], &key[5], &key[6], &key[7]};
@@ -170,19 +170,19 @@ get_ipv6_5tuple(struct rte_mbuf *m0, __m128i mask0,
 
 static inline void
 em_get_dst_port_ipv6x8(struct lcore_conf *qconf, struct rte_mbuf *m[8],
-		uint8_t portid, uint16_t dst_port[8])
+		uint8_t portid, uint32_t dst_port[8])
 {
 	int32_t ret[8];
 	union ipv6_5tuple_host key[8];
 
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[0], mask1, mask2, &key[0]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[1], mask1, mask2, &key[1]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[2], mask1, mask2, &key[2]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[3], mask1, mask2, &key[3]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[4], mask1, mask2, &key[4]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[5], mask1, mask2, &key[5]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[6], mask1, mask2, &key[6]);
-	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[7], mask1, mask2, &key[7]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[0], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[0]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[1], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[1]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[2], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[2]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[3], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[3]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[4], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[4]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[5], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[5]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[6], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[6]);
+	get_ipv6_5tuple(m[7], mask1.x, mask2.x, &key[7]);
 
 	const void *key_array[8] = {&key[0], &key[1], &key[2], &key[3],
 			&key[4], &key[5], &key[6], &key[7]};
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ l3fwd_em_send_packets(int nb_rx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts_burst,
 		uint8_t portid, struct lcore_conf *qconf)
 {
 	int32_t j;
-	uint16_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
+	uint32_t dst_port[MAX_PKT_BURST];
 
 	/*
 	 * Send nb_rx - nb_rx%8 packets
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] l3fwd: Fix compilation with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP
  2016-03-16  6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Maciej Czekaj
@ 2016-03-21 11:35   ` Thomas Monjalon
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2016-03-21 11:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Maciej Czekaj; +Cc: dev, tomaszx.kulasek

2016-03-16 07:23, Maciej Czekaj:
> l3fwd does not compile with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP.
> 2 issues:
>  * in 64d395 mask0 changed type from xmm_t to rte_xmm_t
>       -> use x field from rte_xmm_t
>  * in dc81eb dst_port parameter changed to uint32_t
>       -> change uint16_t dst_port to uin32_t dsp_port
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Czekaj <Maciej.Czekaj@caviumnetworks.com>

Applied, thanks

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-21 11:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-03-15 23:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] l3fwd: Fix compilation with HASH_MULTI_LOOKUP Maciej Czekaj
2016-03-16  0:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-16  6:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Maciej Czekaj
2016-03-21 11:35   ` Thomas Monjalon

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).