DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 17:30:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459351827-3346-4-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459351827-3346-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com>

To avoid a race condition while creating a new hash object, the
list has to be locked before the lookup, and released only once the
new object is added in the list.

Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
---
 lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
index ccec2db..18351fa 100644
--- a/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
+++ b/lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c
@@ -228,11 +228,17 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params)
 
 	snprintf(hash_name, sizeof(hash_name), "HT_%s", params->name);
 
-	/* Guarantee there's no existing */
-	h = rte_hash_find_existing(params->name);
-	if (h != NULL) {
+	rte_rwlock_write_lock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK);
+
+	/* guarantee there's no existing */
+	TAILQ_FOREACH(te, hash_list, next) {
+		h = (struct rte_hash *) te->data;
+		if (strncmp(name, h->name, RTE_HASH_NAMESIZE) == 0)
+			break;
+	}
+	if (te != NULL) {
 		rte_errno = EEXIST;
-		return NULL;
+		goto err;
 	}
 
 	te = rte_zmalloc("HASH_TAILQ_ENTRY", sizeof(*te), 0);
@@ -359,13 +365,13 @@ rte_hash_create(const struct rte_hash_parameters *params)
 	for (i = 1; i < params->entries + 1; i++)
 		rte_ring_sp_enqueue(r, (void *)((uintptr_t) i));
 
-	rte_rwlock_write_lock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK);
 	te->data = (void *) h;
 	TAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(hash_list, te, next);
 	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK);
 
 	return h;
 err:
+	rte_rwlock_write_unlock(RTE_EAL_TAILQ_RWLOCK);
 	rte_free(te);
 	rte_free(h);
 	rte_free(buckets);
-- 
2.1.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-30 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-15 12:25 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] hash/lpm: return NULL if the object exists Olivier Matz
2016-03-25 10:32 ` Olivier Matz
2016-03-25 10:45   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-30 15:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] fix lpm and hash creation Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 21:46     ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-31  7:35       ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-01 16:25         ` Olivier Matz
2016-03-31 10:55       ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-03-30 15:30   ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2016-03-30 15:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-03-31  7:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] fix lpm and hash creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:05       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-05  7:35     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:00       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-05 11:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 11:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-04-05 15:51       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Thomas Monjalon
2016-04-06 10:11         ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-06 10:32       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-06 11:14         ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 11:20           ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2016-04-06 11:57             ` Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:27       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:27         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/4] lpm: allocation of an existing object should fail Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:27         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/4] hash: " Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:28         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/4] hash: keep the list locked at creation Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 13:28         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/4] autotest: fix func reentrancy Olivier Matz
2016-04-06 15:31         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/4] fix creation of duplicate lpm and hash Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1459351827-3346-4-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).