From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com
 [209.85.212.179]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7426902
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:59:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so69336671wic.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 05:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=oEubcl/upz3B819IepcAdSHRn2/JbRbCW2NmpO+jdIg=;
 b=PxhOAD5UfYf/q5s3/f4tPVQ48e3gwhTgnAhbOvwMwBdkwPUEj+7EiNNcb5R1W+2oEB
 96+XwdFub/g8oJpAoe50+svVkYUbVv0MRWm2ZzzZV1wPKwcvbsUt9ASLgYI31Hh0qrA1
 2mmWsMViSLcRWGFGnO/6FB4Rwdw75K4BvBtgy2sz7tz45K1UCEeNzyUhz+emtz3Sjl6D
 /JTlJa7U0DoUPlNIIDBcskC9HKu7VD7Z/uDLcMfG3imDHQ2PlVzPpLvIt/63nXJbnywk
 Xk7XwKmKO3yoyOum1IG5TN9s3na4MXYFWTB9hdF0JY0Ncdj77YJ6g3/pYPdOwAnlYFM3
 jZ7A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn3cn+Ffo8a/rX3QGbwjlp3sD/T8pmszcTkzxhR/T7oJjMEhxda+0J0yfhvlHktVGFmrbzd
X-Received: by 10.180.23.71 with SMTP id k7mr18530587wif.11.1442408384383;
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 05:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ww8sm26514903wjb.4.2015.09.16.05.59.43
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 16 Sep 2015 05:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 14:58:36 +0200
Message-ID: <1465261.rIY0HBKrif@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE20233D44E@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
References: <1442322474-27380-1-git-send-email-john.mcnamara@intel.com>
 <2874598.qVsS3oCtQ8@xps13>
 <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE20233D44E@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: update the dpdk 2.2 release notes
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 12:59:44 -0000

2015-09-16 10:50, Mcnamara, John:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > In order to easily read the release notes, I suggest to order items
> > logically, starting with API (ethdev, cryptodev), EAL, drivers, libs,
> > tools, examples.
> > Maybe that adding some subtitles would help.
> > Opinions?
> 
> Hi
> 
> I forget to do it with the above section but in the previous release notes I sorted the "Resolved Issues" alphabetically. It isn't a logical ordering but it is reasonably easy to navigate and understand:
> 
> http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_2_1.html#resolved-issues
> 
> Would that be sufficient?

To me, reading an alphabetically sorted list of fixes, is like reading
a random list: there is no real logic.
Grouping drivers together seems easier.
Other opinions?
Other people reading the release notes? ;)